Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717799›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

Remote follow-up after cataract surgery (CORE-RCT): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Janneau L J Claessens, Joukje C Wanten, Noël J C Bauer, Rudy M M A Nuijts, Oliver Findl, Josef Huemer, Saskia M Imhof, Robert P L Wisse

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04809402 (Cataract Online Refraction Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04809402 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cataract Online Refraction Evaluation: A Multi Center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2021 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsCataractArmsremote monitoring after cataract surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Janneau L J ClaessensDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Postbus 85500, Huispostnummer E03.136, Utrecht, 3508 GA, the Netherlands. j.l.j.claessens@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-9080
Joukje C WantenUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Noël J C BauerUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Rudy M M A NuijtsUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Oliver FindlVienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Josef HuemerVienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Saskia M ImhofDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Postbus 85500, Huispostnummer E03.136, Utrecht, 3508 GA, the Netherlands.
Robert P L WisseDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Postbus 85500, Huispostnummer E03.136, Utrecht, 3508 GA, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLHanusch Hospital · ATMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Health~Holland LSHM20062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCataract surgery has become one of the most performed surgical procedures worldwide. Postoperative management consists of routine clinical examinations to assess post-operative visual function and detect possible adverse events. Due to the low incidence of complications, the majority of clinic visits after cataract surgery are uneventful. Nonetheless, valuable time and hospital resources are consumed. We hypothesize that remote post-operative follow-up involving teleconsultations and self-assessments of visual function and health status, could be a valid alternative to face-to-face clinical examinations in selected patient groups. The practice of remote follow-up after cataract surgery has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity, safety and cost-effectiveness of remote cataract surgery follow-up, and to report on the patients' experiences with remotely self-assessing visual function.

methodsThis study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients planned for cataract surgery on both eyes, without ocular comorbidities, are eligible for participation. Participants will be allocated (1:1) into one of the two study groups: 'telemonitoring' or 'usual care'. Participants in the 'telemonitoring' group will perform in-home assessments after cataract surgery (remote web-based eye exams and digital questionnaires on their own devices). Participants in the 'usual care' group will have regular post-operative consultations, according to the study site's regular practice. Outcome measures include accuracy of the web-based eye exam for assessing visual acuity and refraction, patient-reported outcome measures (visual function and quality of life), adverse events, and cost aspects. DISCUSSION: Investigating remote follow-up after cataract surgery fits the current trends of digitization of health care. We believe that remote self-care can be a promising avenue to comply with the increasing demands of cataract care. This randomized controlled trial provides scientific evidence on this unmet need and delivers the desired insights on (cost)effectiveness of remote follow-up after cataract surgery.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04809402. Date of registration: March 22, 2021.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionFollow-Up StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVisual AcuityCataractEaseeE-healthEye careRemote careTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36717799
PMCPMC9885558
OpenAlexW4318476842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.