Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717788›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Classification of benign and malignant subtypes of breast cancer histopathology imaging using hybrid CNN-LSTM based transfer learning.

Mahati Munikoti Srikantamurthy, V P Subramanyam Rallabandi, Dawood Babu Dudekula, Sathishkumar Natarajan, Junhyung Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
28.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahati Munikoti Srikantamurthy3BIGS Omicscore Pvt. Ltd., 909 Lavelle Building, Richmond Circle, Bangalore, 560025, India.
V P Subramanyam Rallabandi3BIGS Omicscore Pvt. Ltd., 909 Lavelle Building, Richmond Circle, Bangalore, 560025, India.
Dawood Babu Dudekula3BIGS Omicscore Pvt. Ltd., 909 Lavelle Building, Richmond Circle, Bangalore, 560025, India.
Sathishkumar Natarajan3BIGS Co. Ltd, 156, B-831, Geumgang Penterium IX Tower, Hwaseong, 18469, Republic of Korea.
Junhyung Park3BIGS Co. Ltd, 156, B-831, Geumgang Penterium IX Tower, Hwaseong, 18469, Republic of Korea. jhpark@3bigs.com.
Towa Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JP

Funding

3BIGS Research Fund 3BIGS-R-20210005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrading of cancer histopathology slides requires more pathologists and expert clinicians as well as it is time consuming to look manually into whole-slide images. Hence, an automated classification of histopathological breast cancer sub-type is useful for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic responses. Recent deep learning methods for medical image analysis suggest the utility of automated radiologic imaging classification for relating disease characteristics or diagnosis and patient stratification.

methodsTo develop a hybrid model using the convolutional neural network (CNN) and the long short-term memory recurrent neural network (LSTM RNN) to classify four benign and four malignant breast cancer subtypes. The proposed CNN-LSTM leveraging on ImageNet uses a transfer learning approach in classifying and predicting four subtypes of each. The proposed model was evaluated on the BreakHis dataset comprises 2480 benign and 5429 malignant cancer images acquired at magnifications of 40×, 100×, 200× and 400×.

resultsThe proposed hybrid CNN-LSTM model was compared with the existing CNN models used for breast histopathological image classification such as VGG-16, ResNet50, and Inception models. All the models were built using three different optimizers such as adaptive moment estimator (Adam), root mean square propagation (RMSProp), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimizers by varying numbers of epochs. From the results, we noticed that the Adam optimizer was the best optimizer with maximum accuracy and minimum model loss for both the training and validation sets. The proposed hybrid CNN-LSTM model showed the highest overall accuracy of 99% for binary classification of benign and malignant cancer, and, whereas, 92.5% for multi-class classifier of benign and malignant cancer subtypes, respectively.

conclusionTo conclude, the proposed transfer learning approach outperformed the state-of-the-art machine and deep learning models in classifying benign and malignant cancer subtypes. The proposed method is feasible in classification of other cancers as well as diseases.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerBreast cancerDeep learningHistopathologyImage classification

Identifiers

PMID36717788
PMCPMC9885590
OpenAlexW4318478374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.