Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717780›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Prior childbirth experience and attitude towards subsequent vaginal birth after one caesarean delivery in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.

Fatimat M Akinlusi, Abideen A Olayiwola, Kabiru A Rabiu, Yusuf A Oshodi, Tawaqualit A Ottun, Khadijah A Shittu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06561984 (Effect of Antenatal Education on Pregnant Women's Knowledge, Attitude and Preferences of Delivery Mode), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06561984 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Antenatal Education on Pregnant Women's Knowledge, Attitude and Preferences of Delivery Mode

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled140ConditionsAntenatal Education, Modes of DeliveryArmsantenatal education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Estimating the prevalence of vaginal birth after cesarean section and repeat cesarean section: An analysis of nationally representative household surveys in 59 low- and middle-income countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatimat M AkinlusiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria. fatimatakinlusi@yahoo.co.uk.
Abideen A OlayiwolaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, No 1 - 5, Oba Akinjobi Way, Ikeja, Nigeria.
Kabiru A RabiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Yusuf A OshodiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Tawaqualit A OttunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Khadijah A ShittuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal United Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior caesarean delivery (CD) impacts CD rates in many parts of the world. In low and middle-income countries, few women attempt a trial of labour after caesarean delivery (TOLAC) due to inadequate resources for safe vaginal birth after caesarean delivery (VBAC). The CD rates continue to rise as more women undergo repeat CD. In Nigeria, VBAC rate is low and the contribution of women's prior childbirth experiences and delivery wishes to this situation deserves further investigation. This study examined the parturient factor in the low VBAC rate to recommend strategies for change.

objectiveTo describe prior caesarean-related childbirth experiences and attitudes towards subsequent vaginal birth in pregnant women with one previous CD.

methodThis cross-sectional study of antenatal clinic attendees in a tertiary hospital employed the convenience sampling method to recruit 216 consenting women with one previous CD. Structured questionnaires were used to collect information on participants' prior caesarean-related birth experiences, attitudes to vaginal birth in the index pregnancy, future delivery intentions and eventual delivery route. Univariate and bivariate analyses compared delivery wishes based on CD type. SPSS version 22.0 was used for data analysis.

resultsThe modal maternal and gestational age groups were 30-39 years (68.1%) and 29-34 weeks (49.1%) respectively; majorities (60.6%) were secundigravida; 61.6% experienced labour before their CDs while 76.9% had emergency CDs. Complications were documented in 1.4% and 11.1% of mothers and babies respectively. Ninety percent reported a satisfactory overall childbirth experience. A majority (83.3%) preferred TOLAC in the index pregnancy because they desired natural childbirth while 16.7% wanted a repeat CD due to the fear of fetal-maternal complications. The previous CD type and desire for more babies were significantly associated with respondents' preferred mode of delivery (p = 0.001 and 0.023 respectively). Women with previous emergency CD were more likely to prefer vaginal delivery.

conclusionsAntenatal women prefer TOLAC in subsequent pregnancies despite prior satisfactory caesarean-related birth experiences. Adoption of TOLAC in appropriately selected cases will impact women's psyche positively and reduce CD rate.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionVaginal Birth after CesareanAdultAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMothersNigeriaParturitionPregnancyCaesarean sectionChildbirth experienceDelivery intentionPrior caesarean delivery

Identifiers

PMID36717780
PMCPMC9885646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.