Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717773›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Convolutional neural network for detecting rib fractures on chest radiographs: a feasibility study.

Jiangfen Wu, Nijun Liu, Xianjun Li, Qianrui Fan, Zhihao Li, Jin Shang, Fei Wang, Bowei Chen, Yuanwang Shen, Pan Cao and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Wrist Joint Injury Diagnosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jiangfen Wu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Nijun Liu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Xianjun LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Qianrui FanInferVision Institute of Research, Beijing, 100025, China.
Zhihao LiGE Healthcare, Xi'an, 710076, China.
Jin ShangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Fei WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Bowei ChenSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710127, China.
Yuanwang ShenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Pan CaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Zhe LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Miaoling LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Jiayao QianInferVision Institute of Research, Beijing, 100025, China.
Jian YangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China. yj1118@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Qinli SunDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061, China. qinlisun@163.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNInferVision (China) · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CNNorthwest University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

Innovation Team Project of Natural Science Fund of Shaanxi Province, China 2019TD-018Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province,China 2021SF-092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest radiography is the standard investigation for identifying rib fractures. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting rib fractures on chest radiographs is limited by image quality control and multilesion screening. To our knowledge, few studies have developed and verified the performance of an AI model for detecting rib fractures by using multi-center radiographs. And existing studies using chest radiographs for multiple rib fracture detection have used more complex and slower detection algorithms, so we aimed to create a multiple rib fracture detection model by using a convolutional neural network (CNN), based on multi-center and quality-normalised chest radiographs.

methodsA total of 1080 radiographs with rib fractures were obtained and randomly divided into the training set (918 radiographs, 85%) and the testing set (162 radiographs, 15%). An object detection CNN, You Only Look Once v3 (YOLOv3), was adopted to build the detection model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC (FROC) were used to evaluate the model's performance. A joint testing group of 162 radiographs with rib fractures and 233 radiographs without rib fractures was used as the internal testing set. Furthermore, an additional 201 radiographs, 121 with rib fractures and 80 without rib fractures, were independently validated to compare the CNN model performance with the diagnostic efficiency of radiologists.

resultsThe sensitivity of the model in the training and testing sets was 92.0% and 91.1%, respectively, and the precision was 68.0% and 81.6%, respectively. FROC in the testing set showed that the sensitivity for whole-lesion detection reached 91.3% when the false-positive of each case was 0.56. In the joint testing group, the case-level accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were 85.1%, 93.2%, 79.4%, and 0.92, respectively. At the fracture level and the case level in the independent validation set, the accuracy and sensitivity of the CNN model were always higher or close to radiologists' readings.

conclusionsThe CNN model, based on YOLOv3, was sensitive for detecting rib fractures on chest radiographs and showed great potential in the preliminary screening of rib fractures, which indicated that CNN can help reduce missed diagnoses and relieve radiologists' workload. In this study, we developed and verified the performance of a novel CNN model for rib fracture detection by using radiography.

Indexed as

Rib FracturesArtificial IntelligenceFeasibility StudiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographyRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityConvolutional neural networkDetection modelRadiographRib fractureYOLO

Identifiers

PMID36717773
PMCPMC9885575
OpenAlexW4318476897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.