Trial reportLeukemia2023
A phase 1b study of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Trial report in Leukemia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invasive fungal infections after Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2026Pooled it
- Regulated cell death programs shaping cancer therapy.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Investigation of the mechanism of hypertension caused by BTKi in the treatment of hematologic diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Drug-Induced Differential Gene Expression Analysis on Nanoliter Droplet Microarrays: Enabling Tool for Functional Precision Oncology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Ibrutinib followed by ofatumumab consolidation in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): GELLC-7 trial from the Spanish group of CLL (GELLC).EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab in relapsed/refractory CLL, evaluating tolerability of 3 sequencing regimens as well as overall safety and efficacy. Fifty-two patients were initially randomized 1:1:1 to receive either obinutuzumab 1 month before ibrutinib initiation, ibrutinib 1 month prior to obinutuzumab initiation, or to start both drugs concomitantly. Higher rates of infusion-related reactions were observed with the first sequence, and only the latter 2 cohorts were expanded. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was uncommon, and notable all-grade non-hematologic toxicities included bruising (58%), hypertension (46%), arthralgia (38%), diarrhea (37%), transaminitis (35%), atrial fibrillation (21%), and serious infection (17%). Best overall response rate was 96% (including 40% CR and 56% PR). Best rates of undetectable minimal residual disease in peripheral blood and bone marrow were 27% and 19%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, four-year progression-free and overall survival rates are 74% and 93%, respectively. Correlative studies demonstrated that serum CCL4 and CXCL13 levels were associated with clinical response, and BH3 profiling revealed increased BCL-2 and BCL-xL dependence in CLL cells from patients on treatment. Overall, ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab was highly active, with a manageable safety profile, supporting further investigation of this type of approach in relapsed/refractory CLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.