ReviewScientific reports2023
Comparative analysis of the relationship between four hepatic steatosis indices and muscle mass.
Review in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of hepatic steatosis Index, fatty liver Index, and metabolic and hormonal biomarkers in differentiating MASLD in polycystic ovary syndrome.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Possible association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease predictors and hand grip strength.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metabolic outcomes in non-alcoholic and alcoholic steatotic liver disease among Korean and American adults.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have attempted to validate the relationship between hepatic steatosis and sarcopenia. The crucial limitation is to establish the status of hepatic steatosis by costly or invasive methods. Therefore, several models predicting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have been developed but have exhibited heterogeneous results. In this study, we aimed to review and compare four representative models and analyze their relationship with the risk of low muscle mass. Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 2008 to 2011 were used to confirm our hypothesis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure the amount of skeletal muscle mass. We used four hepatic steatosis indices: hepatic steatosis index (HSI), Framingham steatosis index (FSI), liver fat score (LFS), and fatty liver index (FLI). Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to reveal the relationship between NAFLD and low skeletal muscle index (LSMI). Pairs of FSI-FLI and HSI-FLI exhibited the best and second-best correlations among all possible pairs. The four hepatic steatosis models were associated with increased risk for LSMI. After removing the body mass index effect, HSI and FLI remained robust predictors for LSMI. NAFLD was a significant and potent risk factor for low skeletal muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.