Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717507›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2023

Updates on the WHO diagnosis of IDH-mutant glioma.

David E Reuss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characteristics of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David E ReussDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. david.reuss@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe WHO classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System represents the international standard classification for brain tumors. In 2021 the 5th edition (WHO CNS5) was published, and this review summarizes the changes regarding IDH-mutant gliomas and discusses unsolved issues and future perspectives.

methodsThis review is based on the 5th edition of the WHO Blue Book of CNS tumors (WHO CNS5) and relevant related papers.

resultsMajor changes include taxonomy and nomenclature of IDH-mutant gliomas. Essential and desirable criteria for classification were established considering technical developments. For the first time molecular features are not only relevant for the classification of IDH-mutant gliomas but may impact grading as well.

conclusionWHO CNS5 classification moves forward towards a classification which is founded on tumor biology and serves clinical needs. The rapidly increasing knowledge on the molecular landscape of IDH-mutant gliomas is expected to further refine classification and grading in the future.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaCentral Nervous SystemHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationWorld Health OrganizationIsocitrate DehydrogenaseClassificationCNS5GliomaIDH-mutantMolecular pathologyNeuropathologyWHO

Identifiers

PMID36717507
PMCPMC10227121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.