Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717134›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Study protocol of the CREDO randomised controlled trial: evaluation of a structured return home consultation for patients suffering from metastaticcancer.

Laëtitia Gimenez, Pascale Grosclaude, Vladimir Druel, Nadège Costa, Cyrille Delpierre, Laurent Molinier, Jean-Pierre Delord, Marie-Eve Rougé Bugat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02857400 (Evaluation of an Organized Consultation "Return Home" of Patients With a Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02857400 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of an Organized Consultation "Return Home" of Patients With a Cancer (CREDO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Claudius RegaudRan2017 to 2022Enrolled667ConditionsMETASTATIC CANCERArmscurrent standard of care, CREDO standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laëtitia GimenezDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Générale - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France laetitia.gimenez@dumg-toulouse.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7522-3995
Pascale GrosclaudeUMR 1295 INSERM - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Vladimir DruelDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Générale - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Nadège CostaUMR 1295 INSERM - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-3960
Cyrille DelpierreUMR 1295 INSERM - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Laurent MolinierUMR 1295 INSERM - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Pierre DelordInstitut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopole (IUCT-O), Toulouse, France.
Marie-Eve Rougé BugatDépartement Universitaire de Médecine Générale - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients suffering from cancer are often managed by multiple health professionals. General practitioners with specific skills in oncology could facilitate care coordination between hospital and general practice in the management of these patients. To explore this hypothesis, we run a randomised clinical trial, called 'Concertation de REtour à DOmicile, CREDO'. The main objective is to explore the effectiveness of a 'return home' consultation compared with standard care. The number of unscheduled visits to care centres is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CREDO is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, prospective trial. It takes place in two specialised cancer care centres in southern France (Occitania region). Patient inclusion criteria are: be over 18 years old; be treated with a first cycle of metastatic chemotherapy in a specialised cancer care centre; have a metastatic solid cancer and be returning home after treatment. Patients are randomised in two arms: standard-arm (conventional management) or intervention-arm (CREDO management). In the intervention arm, a 'return home' consultation is carried out in three steps. First, the investigating GP (GP with specific skills in oncology) from the specialised care centre collects information about the patient and patient's management choices. Then, the investigating GP conducts an interview with the patient's referring GP to quickly communicate and discuss information about the patient. Finally, the investigating GP summarises these exchanges and transmits this information to the care centres chosen by the patient.All the patients are followed for 1 year.Statistical and medicoeconomic analysis are planned. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier and was approved by the ethics committee of South-Western French Committee for the Protection of Persons (number: 2016-A01587-44) and from the French National Drug Safety Agency (ANSM, number: 2016111500034).An international publication of the final results and conference presentations will be planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02857400.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAdolescentHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPatientsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeONCOLOGYOrganisation of health servicesPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID36717134
PMCPMC9887714
OpenAlexW4318671235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.