Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36716754›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2023

COVID-19 lateral flow IgG seropositivity and serum neutralising antibody responses after primary and booster vaccinations in Chile: a cross-sectional study.

Denis Sauré, Miguel O'Ryan, Juan Pablo Torres, Marcela Zuñiga, Ricardo Soto-Rifo, Fernando Valiente-Echeverría, Aracelly Gaete-Argel, Ignasi Neira, Vicente Saavedra, Mónica L Acevedo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denis SauréIndustrial Engineering Department, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Santiago, Chile.
Miguel O'RyanPrograma de Microbiología y Micología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Santiago, Chile.
Juan Pablo TorresDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Facultad de Medicina, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Santiago, Chile.
Marcela ZuñigaSubsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Ricardo Soto-RifoLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, y Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile.
Fernando Valiente-EcheverríaLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, y Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile.
Aracelly Gaete-ArgelLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, y Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile.
Ignasi NeiraInstituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Santiago, Chile.
Vicente SaavedraLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, y Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Mónica L AcevedoLaboratorio de Virología Molecular y Celular, y Programa de Virología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile.
Carmen ArchilaMutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile.
Fernando AcuñaMutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile.
Manuel RainMutual de Seguridad, Santiago, Chile.
Leonardo J BassoCivil Engineering Department, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: lbasso@ing.uchile.cl.
Hospital Dipreca · CLComplex Engineering System Institute · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBy June 30, 2022, 92·6% of the Chilean population older than 18 years had received a full primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series, mostly with CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech), and 78·4% had received a booster dose, mostly heterologous with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca). We previously reported national seroprevalence data from lateral flow testing of IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies up to 16 weeks after primary vaccination. Our aim here was to study IgG seropositivity dynamics up to 30 weeks after primary vaccination and, in CoronaVac recipients, up to 26 weeks after booster vaccination, and to establish the correlation between lateral flow tests and neutralising antibody titres.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, testing stations for SARS-CoV-2 IgG detection were selected and installed from March 12, 2021, in hotspots in 24 large Chilean cities, and were maintained until March 31, 2022. Individuals voluntarily approaching the testing stations were invited to perform a rapid lateral flow test via a finger prick and complete a questionnaire. Between Aug 12, 2021, and April 1, 2022, volunteers seeking medical care in the Mutual de Seguridad de la Cámara Chilena de la Construcción provided blood samples for lateral flow testing and neutralising antibody studies; inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years, history of complete primary vaccination series with CoronaVac, BNT162b2, or ChAdOx1, or no vaccine, and no previous COVID-19 diagnosis. We tested the difference in IgG positivity across time, and between primary and booster doses, in all eligible participants with complete records, controlling for age, gender, and comorbidities. We also assessed the predictive power of neutralising antibody titres and sociodemographic characteristics on the probability of IgG positive results using multivariable logistic regression.

findingsOf 107 220 individuals recruited at the testing stations, 101 070 were included in our analysis (59 862 [59·2%] women and 41 208 [40·8%] men). 65 902 (65·2%) received primary vaccination series with CoronaVac, 18 548 (18·4%) with BNT162b2, and 606 (0·6%) with ChAdOx1, and 16 014 (15·8%) received no vaccine. Among the 61 767 individuals with a complete primary vaccination series with CoronaVac, 608 (1·0%) received a CoronaVac booster, 10 095 (16·3%) received a BNT162b2 booster, and 5435 (8·8%) received a ChAdOx1 booster. After ChAdOx1 primary vaccination, seropositivity peaked at week 5 after the second dose, occurring in 13 (92·9%, 95% CI 79·4-100·0) of 14 individuals. In participants who received a complete CoronaVac primary series, the decline in seropositivity stabilised at week 18 after the second dose (86 [44·7%, 95% CI 41·8-47·7] of 1087 individuals), whereas after receiving BNT162b2, seropositivity declined slightly by week 25 after the second dose (161 [94·2%, 90·6-97·7] of 171). A lower proportion of individuals who received the CoronaVac primary series and a homologous booster were seropositive (279 [85·6%, 95% CI 81·8-89·4] of 326) by weeks 2-18 than those who received a BNT162b2 booster (7031 [98·6%, 98·4-98·9] of 7128) or a ChAdOx1 booster (2893 [98·0%, 97·5-98·5] of 2953). The correlation between IgG positivity and log of the infectious dose in 50% of neutralising antibodies was moderate, with a sensitivity of 81·4% (95% CI 76·3-86·6) and specificity of 92·5% (73·3-100·0).

interpretationDynamic monitoring of IgG positivity to SARS-CoV-2 can characterise antibody waning over time in the absence or presence of booster doses, providing relevant data for the design of vaccination strategies. The correlation between lateral flow test IgG titres and neutralising antibody concentrations suggests that they could be a quick and effective surveillance tool to measure protection against SARS-CoV-2.

fundingInstituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministry of Health, Chile, and Mutual de Seguridad de la Cámara Chilena de la Construcción.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineChileCOVID-19 TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin Gsinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID36716754
PMCPMC9883018
OpenAlexW4318302124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.