Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36716348›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2023

Neural responses in macaque prefrontal cortex are linked to strategic exploration.

Caroline I Jahn, Jan Grohn, Steven Cuell, Andrew Emberton, Sebastien Bouret, Mark E Walton, Nils Kolling, Jérôme Sallet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Decision-Making, Pro-variance Biases and Mood-Related Traits.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline I JahnWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9894-9668
Jan GrohnWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Steven CuellWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andrew EmbertonBiomedical Science Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sebastien BouretMotivation, Brain and Behavior Team, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Paris, France.
Mark E WaltonWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nils KollingWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, OBHA, University of Oxford, Headington, United Kingdom.
Jérôme SalletWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R010803/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R01803/1Medical Research Council MR/K501256/1Medical Research Council MR/N013468/1Wellcome Trust 090051/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 096587/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 202831/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have been shown to strategically explore. They can identify situations in which gathering information about distant and uncertain options is beneficial for the future. Because primates rely on scarce resources when they forage, they are also thought to strategically explore, but whether they use the same strategies as humans and the neural bases of strategic exploration in monkeys are largely unknown. We designed a sequential choice task to investigate whether monkeys mobilize strategic exploration based on whether information can improve subsequent choice, but also to ask the novel question about whether monkeys adjust their exploratory choices based on the contingency between choice and information, by sometimes providing the counterfactual feedback about the unchosen option. We show that monkeys decreased their reliance on expected value when exploration could be beneficial, but this was not mediated by changes in the effect of uncertainty on choices. We found strategic exploratory signals in anterior and mid-cingulate cortex (ACC/MCC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). This network was most active when a low value option was chosen, which suggests a role in counteracting expected value signals, when exploration away from value should to be considered. Such strategic exploration was abolished when the counterfactual feedback was available. Learning from counterfactual outcome was associated with the recruitment of a different circuit centered on the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), where we showed that monkeys represent chosen and unchosen reward prediction errors. Overall, our study shows how ACC/MCC-dlPFC and OFC circuits together could support exploitation of available information to the fullest and drive behavior towards finding more information through exploration when it is beneficial.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPrefrontal CortexAnimalsFrontal LobeHumansMacaca mulattaReward

Identifiers

PMID36716348
PMCPMC9910800
OpenAlexW4318578144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.