SynthesisPLoS medicine2023
Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study.
Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiancestry and Multitrait GWAS Meta-Analysis on Schizophrenia With a Sample of 322,321 Unveils Genetic Links to Chronic Lung Diseases.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Sepsis subtypes and differential treatment response to vitamin C: biological sub-study of the LOVIT trial.Intensive care medicine · 2025Trial
- [Pharmacological immunomodulation in sepsis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Interleukin-39 is a Prognostic Biomarker and Therapy Target for Sepsis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Association of serum uric acid, gout with incident sepsis: a large population-based prospective cohort study from UK Biobank.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Chimeric IL-6/4R-LL37 Engineered Macrophages Achieve Synchronized Inflammation Control and Antimicrobial Defence in Sepsis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A cross-ancestry genetic atlas of shared susceptibility between infectious diseases and cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study of paediatric bacteraemia and sepsis.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet and Risk of Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study from the UK Biobank.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- Multiomics Mendelian randomization identifies serpin family G member 1 as a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease modulator.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Evidence of immune-metabolic imbalance prior to sepsis: a prospective study in the UK Biobank.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Potential mitochondria-associated pathogenic genes in sepsis: a multi-omics Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Disentangling Links Between Lung Cancer and Infectious Pneumonia via Real-World Data and Integrative Genomics.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Association of TyG index with sepsis incidence and mortality: a prospective study with diabetes stratification.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Genetic associations in sepsis and ARDS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Adiposity distribution and risks of 12 obesity-related cancers: a Mendelian randomization analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Plasma apolipoprotein A-I is a causal protective factor in sepsis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mendelian Randomization and Infection: Pitfalls and Promises.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Review
- IL6 genetic perturbation mimicking IL-6 inhibition is associated with lower cardiometabolic risk.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- The causal association between insomnia and cognitive decline: A 2-sample, 2-step multivariable Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2025Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is characterised by dysregulated, life-threatening immune responses, which are thought to be driven by cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6). Genetic variants in IL6R known to down-regulate IL-6 signalling are associated with improved Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, a finding later confirmed in randomised trials of IL-6 receptor antagonists (IL6RAs). We hypothesised that blockade of IL6R could also improve outcomes in sepsis. METHODS AND
findingsWe performed a Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in and near IL6R to evaluate the likely causal effects of IL6R blockade on sepsis (primary outcome), sepsis severity, other infections, and COVID-19 (secondary outcomes). We weighted SNPs by their effect on CRP and combined results across them in inverse variance weighted meta-analysis, proxying the effect of IL6RA. Our outcomes were measured in UK Biobank, FinnGen, the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI), and the GenOSept and GainS consortium. We performed several sensitivity analyses to test assumptions of our methods, including utilising variants around CRP and gp130 in a similar analysis. In the UK Biobank cohort (N = 486,484, including 11,643 with sepsis), IL6R blockade was associated with a decreased risk of our primary outcome, sepsis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.96, per unit of natural log-transformed CRP decrease). The size of this effect increased with severity, with larger effects on 28-day sepsis mortality (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.15); critical care admission with sepsis (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.78) and critical care death with sepsis (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.98). Similar associations were seen with severe respiratory infection: OR for pneumonia in critical care 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.97) and for sepsis survival in critical care (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.04 to 1.31) in the GainS and GenOSept consortium, although this result had a large degree of imprecision. We also confirm the previously reported protective effect of IL6R blockade on severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84) in the COVID-19 HGI, which was of similar magnitude to that seen in sepsis. Sensitivity analyses did not alter our primary results. These results are subject to the limitations and assumptions of MR, which in this case reflects interpretation of these SNP effects as causally acting through blockade of IL6R, and reflect lifetime exposure to IL6R blockade, rather than the effect of therapeutic IL6R blockade.
conclusionsIL6R blockade is causally associated with reduced incidence of sepsis. Similar but imprecisely estimated results supported a causal effect also on sepsis related mortality and critical care admission with sepsis. These effects are comparable in size to the effect seen in severe COVID-19, where IL-6 receptor antagonists were shown to improve survival. These data suggest that a randomised trial of IL-6 receptor antagonists in sepsis should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.