Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36716318›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2023

Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study.

Fergus W Hamilton, Matt Thomas, David Arnold, Tom Palmer, Ed Moran, Alexander J Mentzer, Nick Maskell, Kenneth Baillie, Charlotte Summers, Aroon Hingorani and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [Pharmacological immunomodulation in sepsis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  4. Interleukin-39 is a Prognostic Biomarker and Therapy Target for Sepsis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic associations in sepsis and ARDS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mendelian Randomization and Infection: Pitfalls and Promises.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Fergus W HamiltonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9760-4059
Matt ThomasIntensive Care Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3407-6762
David ArnoldAcademic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Tom PalmerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-4511
Ed MoranInfection Science, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alexander J MentzerWellcome Centre For Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4502-2209
Nick MaskellAcademic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Kenneth BaillieRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Charlotte SummersDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-2873
Aroon HingoraniUCL Institute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alasdair MacGowanInfection Science, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Golam M KhandakerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ruth MitchellMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Peter GhazalProject Sepsis, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0035-2228
Nicholas J TimpsonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-9189
University of Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBCardiff University · GBCentre for Human Genetics · GBHealth Data Research UK · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013732/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013759/1British Heart Foundation AA/18/6/34223Cancer Research UK C18281/A29019Department of Health BRC-1215-20014Department of Health NIHR203315Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_PC_20004Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/1Medical Research Council MR/S037675/1Medical Research Council MR/V004905/1Medical Research Council MR/V033867/1Medical Research Council MR/W014416/1Medical Research Council MR/X005070/1Wellcome Trust 201486/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 202802/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 223164/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is characterised by dysregulated, life-threatening immune responses, which are thought to be driven by cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6). Genetic variants in IL6R known to down-regulate IL-6 signalling are associated with improved Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, a finding later confirmed in randomised trials of IL-6 receptor antagonists (IL6RAs). We hypothesised that blockade of IL6R could also improve outcomes in sepsis. METHODS AND

findingsWe performed a Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in and near IL6R to evaluate the likely causal effects of IL6R blockade on sepsis (primary outcome), sepsis severity, other infections, and COVID-19 (secondary outcomes). We weighted SNPs by their effect on CRP and combined results across them in inverse variance weighted meta-analysis, proxying the effect of IL6RA. Our outcomes were measured in UK Biobank, FinnGen, the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI), and the GenOSept and GainS consortium. We performed several sensitivity analyses to test assumptions of our methods, including utilising variants around CRP and gp130 in a similar analysis. In the UK Biobank cohort (N = 486,484, including 11,643 with sepsis), IL6R blockade was associated with a decreased risk of our primary outcome, sepsis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.96, per unit of natural log-transformed CRP decrease). The size of this effect increased with severity, with larger effects on 28-day sepsis mortality (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.15); critical care admission with sepsis (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.78) and critical care death with sepsis (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.98). Similar associations were seen with severe respiratory infection: OR for pneumonia in critical care 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.97) and for sepsis survival in critical care (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.04 to 1.31) in the GainS and GenOSept consortium, although this result had a large degree of imprecision. We also confirm the previously reported protective effect of IL6R blockade on severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84) in the COVID-19 HGI, which was of similar magnitude to that seen in sepsis. Sensitivity analyses did not alter our primary results. These results are subject to the limitations and assumptions of MR, which in this case reflects interpretation of these SNP effects as causally acting through blockade of IL6R, and reflect lifetime exposure to IL6R blockade, rather than the effect of therapeutic IL6R blockade.

conclusionsIL6R blockade is causally associated with reduced incidence of sepsis. Similar but imprecisely estimated results supported a causal effect also on sepsis related mortality and critical care admission with sepsis. These effects are comparable in size to the effect seen in severe COVID-19, where IL-6 receptor antagonists were shown to improve survival. These data suggest that a randomised trial of IL-6 receptor antagonists in sepsis should be considered.

Indexed as

COVID-19SepsisHospitalizationHumansInterleukin-6Mendelian Randomization AnalysisReceptors, Interleukin-6IL6R protein, humanInterleukin-6Receptors, Interleukin-6

Identifiers

PMID36716318
PMCPMC9925069
OpenAlexW4318579216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.