Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36715742›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2023

Adverse events associated with pessary use over one year among women attending a pessary care clinic.

Arshia Kakkar, Adi Reuveni-Salzman, Jouhayna Bentaleb, Eric Belzile, Lisa Merovitz, Maryse Larouche

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arshia KakkarFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Adi Reuveni-SalzmanDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jouhayna BentalebDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Eric BelzileSt. Mary's Research Centre, 4Th Floor Hayes Pavilion, 3830 Lacombe, Montreal, QC, H3T 1M5, Canada.
Lisa MerovitzDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maryse LaroucheDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. ml.larouche@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9942-5540
McGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe primary objective was to determine the adverse event rate associated with pessary use. Secondary objectives were to determine discontinuation, patient satisfaction, and factors associated with adverse events.

methodsA retrospective observational study included patients attending a nurse-led pessary clinic with ≥ 1 year follow-up. Patients were fitted with a pessary by a urogynecologist and pessary care by a nurse was performed every 3-4 months. Demographic characteristics, pessary fitting, adverse events, their management and discontinuation were recorded. Pearson Chi-square and Fisher exact tests assessed the association between predetermined risk factors and pessary complications or discontinuation. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were computed.

results215 women were followed for a mean (standard deviation) of 4.4 (1.9) years. Mean age was 73.8 (8.7) years. Adverse event rate was 83.7%; most commonly vaginal discharge, vaginal bleeding and erosions. Women with cardiovascular risk factors were less likely to develop pessary-related adverse events (79.7% vs. 91.9%, p = 0.03). Gellhorn and donut pessaries were more commonly associated with pessary erosions than ring with support pessaries or incontinence rings (RR 2.37 [1.67; 3.38]). Thirty-five (16.3%) women discontinued pessary use at a mean of 3.3 (1.7) years after initial fitting. Having a pessary erosion was not associated with discontinuation (p = 0.698), but recurrent erosions were (p = 0.012).

conclusionAdverse events were common among women continuing to use pessaries past 1 year, but adherence and satisfaction rates remained high after 4.4 years. Pessary type and absence of cardiovascular factors were associated with pessary-related adverse events.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseVaginal DischargeAgedFemaleHumansPatient SatisfactionPessariesRisk FactorsLong-termPelvic organ prolapsePessaryPessary-related complications

Identifiers

PMID36715742
OpenAlexW4318479345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.