ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023
Comparison of partial vs. total ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium prosthesis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of a Flexible Ruler in Measuring the Length of Artificial Stapes During Stapedotomy Under Otoendoscopy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Trial
- Titanium Biohybrid Middle Ear Prostheses: A PreliminaryJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Extrusion and Dislocation in Titanium Middle Ear Prostheses: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeComparison of the hearing outcomes of titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) vs. titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) with footplate shoe (Omega Connector) in second stage ossicular chain reconstruction surgeries.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital, we compared the hearing outcomes in 248 patients who had undergone ossicular chain reconstruction with titanium prostheses PORP (n = 115) vs. TORP (n = 133) from August 2017 to June 2021. Pre-and post-operative audiometric data were assessed.
resultsIn general, we found that there were no significant differences between PORP and TORP groups in gains of BC (P = 0.080), AC (P = 0.454), ABG (P = 0.928), SRT (P = 0.065), and SDS (P = 0.363). There were no significant differences in terms of ABG gain between the two groups. Regarding ABG gains frequency-specific analysis in the ears with pre-operative conductive hearing loss, there were no significant differences between low-frequencies (P = 0.260) and high-frequencies (P = 0.973) between the two groups.
conclusionTo sum up, this research provided additional evidence with respect to hearing outcomes after staged ossicular chain reconstruction with PORP and TORP. The practical application of our study is that TORP with footplate shoe (Omega Connector) is comparable with PORP in staged ossiculoplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.