ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2023
Microscopic mechanism of PIEZO1 activation by pressure-induced membrane stretch.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Yoda molecules agonize PIEZO2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- PIEZO1 in Immune Cells: From Force to Function.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Review
- Mechanical Biomimetic Nanocomposites for Multidimensional Treatment of Arterial Thrombosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Structural and thermodynamic framework for PIEZO1 modulation by small molecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanosensitive PIEZO1 ion channels open in response to membrane stretch. Yet, the underlying microscopic mechanism of this activation remains unknown. To probe this mechanism, we used cell-attached pressure-clamp recordings to measure single channel currents at different steady-state negative pipette pressures, spanning the full range of the channel's pressure sensitivity. Pressure-dependent activation occurs through a sharp reduction of the mean shut duration and through a moderate increase of the mean open duration. Across all tested pressures, the distribution of open and shut dwell times best follows sums of two and three exponential components, respectively. As the magnitude of the pressure stimulus increases, the time constants of most of these exponential components gradually change, in opposite directions for open and shut dwell times, and to a similar extent. In addition, while the relative amplitudes of fast and slow components remain unchanged for open intervals, they fully reverse for shut intervals, further reducing the mean shut duration. Using two-dimensional dwell time analysis, Markov-chain modeling, and simulations, we identified a minimal five-states model which recapitulates essential characteristics of single channel data, including microscopic reversibility, correlations between adjacent open and shut intervals, and asymmetric modulation of dwell times by pressure. This study identifies a microscopic mechanism for the activation of PIEZO1 channels by pressure-induced membrane stretch and deepens our fundamental understanding of mechanotransduction by a vertebrate member of the PIEZO channel family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.