Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36715369›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2023

Evaluation of Complex Mixture Toxicity in the Milwaukee Estuary (WI, USA) Using Whole-Mixture and Component-Based Evaluation Methods.

Erin M Maloney, Daniel L Villeneuve, Kathleen M Jensen, Brett R Blackwell, Michael D Kahl, Shane T Poole, Kelsey Vitense, David J Feifarek, Grace Patlewicz, Kendra Dean and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Erin M MaloneyDepartment of Biology, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Minnesota, Duluth, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6060-4741
Daniel L VilleneuveGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2801-0203
Kathleen M JensenGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Brett R BlackwellGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1296-4539
Michael D KahlGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Shane T PooleGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Kelsey VitenseScientific Computing and Data Curation Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
David J FeifarekGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Grace PatlewiczCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3863-9689
Kendra DeanGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Charlene TiltonGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Eric C RandolphGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Jenna E CavallinGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7883-4740
Carlie A LaLoneGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3174-1314
Donovan BlatzGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Christopher M SchauppGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Gerald T AnkleyGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities introduce complex mixtures into aquatic environments, necessitating mixture toxicity evaluation during risk assessment. There are many alternative approaches that can be used to complement traditional techniques for mixture assessment. Our study aimed to demonstrate how these approaches could be employed for mixture evaluation in a target watershed. Evaluations were carried out over 2 years (2017-2018) across 8-11 study sites in the Milwaukee Estuary (WI, USA). Whole mixtures were evaluated on a site-specific basis by deploying caged fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) alongside composite samplers for 96 h and characterizing chemical composition, in vitro bioactivity of collected water samples, and in vivo effects in whole organisms. Chemicals were grouped based on structure/mode of action, bioactivity, and pharmacological activity. Priority chemicals and mixtures were identified based on their relative contributions to estimated mixture pressure (based on cumulative toxic units) and via predictive assessments (random forest regression). Whole mixture assessments identified target sites for further evaluation including two sites targeted for industrial/urban chemical mixture effects assessment; three target sites for pharmaceutical mixture effects assessment; three target sites for further mixture characterization; and three low-priority sites. Analyses identified 14 mixtures and 16 chemicals that significantly contributed to cumulative effects, representing high or medium priority targets for further ecotoxicological evaluation, monitoring, or regulatory assessment. Overall, our study represents an important complement to single-chemical prioritizations, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the cumulative effects of mixtures detected in a target watershed. Furthermore, it demonstrates how different tools and techniques can be used to identify diverse facets of mixture risk and highlights strategies that can be considered in future complex mixture assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1229-1256. © 2023 SETAC.

Indexed as

CyprinidaeWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEcotoxicologyEnvironmental MonitoringEstuariesWater Pollutants, ChemicalComputational toxicologyContaminants of emerging concernEffects-based monitoringIn situ testingIn vitro analysis

Identifiers

PMID36715369
PMCPMC10775314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.