ArticlePlant physiology2023
Cryptochromes suppress leaf senescence in response to blue light in Arabidopsis.
Article in Plant physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anthocyanin accumulation differences in European pears caused by Phytochrome-interacting factor 3 (PcPIF3) promoter mutations under UV-B.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- The mechanism of low blue light-induced leaf senescence mediated by GmCRY1s in soybean.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Light quality regulates plant biomass and fruit quality through a photoreceptor-dependent HY5-LHC/CYCB module in tomato.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Shade-Induced Leaf Senescence in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Epigenetic control of plant senescence and cell death and its application in crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The induction and progression of leaf senescence are effectively changed according to the light environment. The leaf senescence response is enhanced when plants are grown under a dense shade cast by neighboring vegetation. Although the fluence rate of the red and blue regions in the light spectrum is strongly attenuated under shade, photosensory mechanisms that underpin the blue light response are still unclear. In this study, we analyzed leaf senescence in response to blue light in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We found that leaf senescence was promoted by the elimination of active phytochrome Pfr by pulsed far-red (FR) light, whereas irradiation with blue light suppressed leaf senescence in the wild type but not in the cryptochrome (CRY)-deficient mutant, cry1 cry2. Hence, two light-sensing modes contributed to the suppression of leaf senescence that was dependent on light spectrum features. First was the leaf senescence response to blue light, which was mediated exclusively by cryptochromes. Second was the phytochrome-mediated leaf senescence response to red/FR light. Physiological analysis of transgenic plants expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged CRY2 revealed that photo-activation of cryptochromes was required to suppress leaf senescence in response to blue light. Transcriptomic analysis further uncovered the molecular and cellular processes involved in the regulation of leaf senescence downstream of cryptochromes. Furthermore, analysis of cryptochrome-downstream components indicated that ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5) and PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF) 4 and PIF5 were required for suppression and promotion of leaf senescence, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.