Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36715266›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Co-creating system-wide improvement for people with traumatic brain injury across one integrated care system in the United Kingdom to initiate a transformation journey through co-production.

Kim Manley, Karen Saunders, David Wilkinson, Rafey Faruqui, Mohamed Sakel

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim ManleyPractice Development and Co Director ImpACT Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2075-2600
Karen SaundersDivision for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-2477
David WilkinsonDirector of the Division of Human and Social Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9973-6477
Rafey FaruquiDepartment of Psychiatry, Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-3316
Mohamed SakelDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-6749-5229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThere is a need for better integration of services across communities and sectors for people living with traumatic brain injury (TBI) to meet their complex needs. Building on insights gained from earlier pilot work, here we report the outcomes of a participatory workshop that sought to better understand the challenges, barriers and opportunities that currently exist within the care pathway for survivors of TBI.

methodsA diverse range of stakeholders from the acute and rehabilitation care pathway and the health and social care system were invited to participate in a 3-h workshop. The participants worked in four mixed subgroups using practice development methodology, which promotes person-centred, inclusive and participatory action.

resultsThematic analysis identified shared purposes and values that were used to produce a detailed implementation and impact framework for application at both the level of the care interface and the overarching integrated care system. A variety of enablers were identified that related to collective values and behaviours, case management, team leadership and integrated team working, workforce capability, evidence-based practice and resourcing. The clinical, economic, cultural and social outcomes associated with these enablers were also identified, and included patient safety, independence and well-being, reduced waiting times, re-admission rates, staff retention and professional development.

conclusionThe co-produced recommendations made within the implementation and impact framework described here provide a means by which the culture and delivery of health and social care services can be better tailored to meet the needs of people living with TBI. We believe that the recommendations will help shape the formation of new services as well as the development of existing ones. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public involvement have been established over a 10-year history of relationship building through a joint forum and events involving three charities representing people with TBI, carers, family members, clinicians, service users, researchers and commissioners, culminating in a politically supported event that identified concerns about the needs of people following TBI. These relationships formed the foundation for the interactive workshop, the focus of this publication.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedCaregiversFamilyHumansUnited Kingdomco-productionneuro-rehabilitationperson-centred carepractice developmentsystem and workforce transformationtransdisciplinarytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36715266
PMCPMC10010072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.