Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36715114›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

The influence of a probiotic/prebiotic supplement on microbial and metabolic parameters of equine cecal fluid or fecal slurry in vitro.

Jennifer L MacNicol, Simone Renwick, Caroline M Ganobis, Emma Allen-Vercoe, Jeffery S Weese, Wendy Pearson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer L MacNicolDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8670-461X
Simone RenwickDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
Caroline M GanobisDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
Emma Allen-VercoeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
Jeffery S WeeseDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
Wendy PearsonDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

Selected BioProducts INC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbes that reside within the equine hindgut create a complex and dynamic ecosystem. The equine hindgut microbiota is intimately associated with health and, as such, represents an area which can be beneficially modified. Synbiotics, supplements that combine probiotic micro-organisms with prebiotic ingredients, are a potential means of influencing the hindgut microbiota to promote health and prevent disease. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the influence of an equine probiotic/prebiotic supplement on characteristics of the microbiota and metabolite production in vitro. Equine cecal fluid and fecal material were collected from an abattoir in QC, CAN. Five hundred milliliters of cecal fluid was used to inoculate chemostat vessels maintained as batch fermenters (chemostat cecal, N = 11) with either 0 g (control) or 0.44 g of supplement added at 12 h intervals. One hundred milliliters of cecal fluid (anaerobic cecal, N = 15) or 5% fecal slurry (anaerobic fecal, N = 6) were maintained in an anaerobic chamber with either 0 g (control) or 0.356 g of supplement added at the time of vessel establishment. Samples were taken from vessels at vessel establishment (0), 24, or 48 h of incubation. Illumina sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and bioinformatics were performed for microbiome analysis. Metabolite data was obtained via NMR spectroscopy. All statistical analyses were run in SAS 9.4. There was no effect of treatment at 24 or 48h on alpha or beta diversity indices and limited taxonomic differences were noted. Acetate, propionate, and butyrate were higher in treated compared to untreated vessels in all methods. A consistent effect of supplementation on the metabolic profile with no discernable impact on the microbiota of these in vitro systems indicates inoculum microbe viability and a utilization of the provided fermentable substrate within the systems. Although no changes within the microbiome were apparent, the consistent changes in metabolites indicates a potential prebiotic effect of the added supplement and merits further exploration.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaProbioticsSynbioticsAnimalsFecesFermentationHealth PromotionHorsesPrebioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SPrebioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16Scecalequinein vitrometabolomemicrobiomesynbiotic

Identifiers

PMID36715114
PMCPMC9994591
OpenAlexW4318476219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.