Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36714829›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Unperceived motor actions of the balance system interfere with the causal attribution of self-motion.

Romain Tisserand, Brandon G Rasman, Nina Omerovic, Ryan M Peters, Patrick A Forbes, Jean-Sébastien Blouin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Balance control threshold to vestibular stimuli.The Journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Different mechanisms of contextual inference govern associatively learned and sensory-evoked postural responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Romain TisserandSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-9886
Brandon G RasmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-8320
Nina OmerovicDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Ryan M PetersSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Patrick A ForbesDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0230-9971
Jean-Sébastien BlouinSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The instability of human bipedalism demands that the brain accurately senses balancing self-motion and determines whether movements originate from self-generated actions or external disturbances. Here, we challenge the longstanding notion that this process relies on a single representation of the body and world to accurately perceive postural orientation and organize motor responses to control balance self-motion. Instead, we find that the conscious sense of balance can be distorted by the corrective control of upright standing. Using psychophysics, we quantified thresholds to imposed perturbations and balance responses evoking cues of self-motion that are (in)distinguishable from corrective balance actions. When standing immobile, participants clearly perceived imposed perturbations. Conversely, when freely balancing, participants often misattributed their own corrective responses as imposed motion because their balance system had detected, integrated, and responded to the perturbation in the absence of conscious perception. Importantly, this only occurred for perturbations encoded ambiguously with balance-correcting responses and that remained below the natural variability of ongoing balancing oscillations. These findings reveal that our balance system operates on its own sensorimotor principles that can interfere with causal attribution of our actions, and that our conscious sense of balance depends critically on the source and statistics of induced and self-generated motion cues.

Indexed as

actionbalance controlperceptionperturbationpostural swaypsychophysicsstanding

Identifiers

PMID36714829
PMCPMC9802180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.