Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36714804›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2022

Assessment of movement disorders using wearable sensors during upper limb tasks: A scoping review.

Inti Vanmechelen, Helga Haberfehlner, Joni De Vleeschhauwer, Ellen Van Wonterghem, Hilde Feys, Kaat Desloovere, Jean-Marie Aerts, Elegast Monbaliu

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Inti VanmechelenResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), KU Leuven Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Bruges, Belgium.
Helga HaberfehlnerResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), KU Leuven Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Bruges, Belgium.
Joni De VleeschhauwerResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Ellen Van WonterghemResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), KU Leuven Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Bruges, Belgium.
Hilde FeysResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Kaat DesloovereResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Pellenberg, Belgium.
Jean-Marie AertsDivision of Animal and Human Health Engineering, KU Leuven, Department of Biosystems, Measure, Model and Manage Bioresponses (M3-BIORES), Leuven, Belgium.
Elegast MonbaliuResearch Group for Neurorehabilitation (eNRGy), KU Leuven Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Bruges, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ataxiadystoniahuntington’s diseaseinertial measurement unit (IMU)Parkinson’s diseasestroketremorupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID36714804
PMCPMC9879015
OpenAlexW4313827874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.