Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36714798›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

A community-partnered approach for diversity in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.

Yelba Castellon-Lopez, Raphael Landovitz, Ejiro Ntekume, Courtney Porter, Rachelle Bross, Robin Hilder, Aziza Lucas-Wright, Eric S Daar, Pedro Chavez, Christopher Blades and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 clinical trial participation and awareness in Texas.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in health services · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yelba Castellon-LopezDepartment of Family Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-7792
Raphael LandovitzDivision of Infectious Disease, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ejiro NtekumeDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-7728
Courtney PorterDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rachelle BrossThe Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Robin HilderDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Aziza Lucas-WrightDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eric S DaarThe Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Pedro ChavezThe Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Christopher BladesUCLA Vine Street Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Savanna CarsonDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-538X
D'Ann MorrisDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stefanie VassarDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alejandra CasillasDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Arleen BrownDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9948-8955
University of California, Los Angeles · USUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Nina Thawata Harawa · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
UCLA AIDS Prevention and Treatment Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069424 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Judith S. Currier, RAPHAEL J LANDOVITZ · 2012 to 2026
$51.8M
UCLA AIDS Prevention and Treatment Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069424 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CURRIER, JUDITH S. · 2007 to 2011
$13.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069424NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069424NIMHD NIH HHS L32 MD011958NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Communities of color have faced disproportionate morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, coupled with historical underrepresentation in US clinical trials, creating challenges for equitable participation in developing and testing a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: To increase diversity, including racial and ethnic representation, in local Los Angeles County NIH-sponsored Phase 3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine clinical trials, we used deliberative community engagement approaches to form a Community Consultant Panel (CCP) that partnered with trial research teams. Thirteen members were recruited, including expertise from essential workers, community-based and faith-based organizations, or leaders from racial and ethnic minority communities. Results: Working closely with local investigators for the vaccine studies, the CCP provided critical insight on best practices for community trust building, clinical trial participation, and reliable information dissemination regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Modifying recruitment, outreach, and trial protocols led to majority-minority participants (55%-78%) in each of the three vaccine clinical trials. CCP's input led to cultural tailoring of recruitment materials, changes in recruitment messaging, and supportive services to improve trial accessibility and acceptability (transportation, protocols for cultural competency, and support linkages to care in case of an adverse event). Barriers to clinical trial participation unable to be resolved included childcare, requests for after-hours appointment availability, and mobile locations for trial visits. Conclusion: Using deliberative community engagement can provide critical and timely insight into the community-centered barriers to COVID-19 vaccine trial participation, including addressing social determinants of health, trust, clinical trial literacy, structural barriers, and identifying trusted messenger and reliable sources of information.

Indexed as

community engagementCOVID-19health equityresearch subject recruitmentvaccine trials

Identifiers

PMID36714798
PMCPMC9874035
OpenAlexW4302303823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.