Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36714741›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Chromium toxicity, speciation, and remediation strategies in soil-plant interface: A critical review.

Usman Zulfiqar, Fasih Ullah Haider, Muhammad Ahmad, Saddam Hussain, Muhammad Faisal Maqsood, Muhammad Ishfaq, Babar Shahzad, Muhammad Mohsin Waqas, Basharat Ali, Muhammad Noaman Tayyab and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
32.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Usman ZulfiqarDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Fasih Ullah HaiderKey Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Muhammad AhmadDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Saddam HussainDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Faisal MaqsoodDepartment of Botany, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Muhammad IshfaqDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Babar ShahzadTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Muhammad Mohsin WaqasDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology (KFUEIT), Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Basharat AliDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology (KFUEIT), Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Noaman TayyabDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Syed Amjad AhmadDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, NFC IEFR, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ilyas KhanDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science Al-Zulfi, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Sayed M EldinCenter of Research, Faculty of Engineering, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, Egypt.
The University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKKhwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology · PKFuture University in Egypt · EGGhazi University · PKMajmaah University · SASouth China Botanical Garden · CNUniversity of Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, environmental pollution with chromium (Cr) has gained significant attention. Although chromium (Cr) can exist in a variety of different oxidation states and is a polyvalent element, only trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] and hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] are found frequently in the natural environment. In the current review, we summarize the biogeochemical procedures that regulate Cr(VI) mobilization, accumulation, bioavailability, toxicity in soils, and probable risks to ecosystem are also highlighted. Plants growing in Cr(VI)-contaminated soils show reduced growth and development with lower agricultural production and quality. Furthermore, Cr(VI) exposure causes oxidative stress due to the production of free radicals which modifies plant morpho-physiological and biochemical processes at tissue and cellular levels. However, plants may develop extensive cellular and physiological defensive mechanisms in response to Cr(VI) toxicity to ensure their survival. To cope with Cr(VI) toxicity, plants either avoid absorbing Cr(VI) from the soil or turn on the detoxifying mechanism, which involves producing antioxidants (both enzymatic and non-enzymatic) for scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Moreover, this review also highlights recent knowledge of remediation approaches i.e., bioremediation/phytoremediation, or remediation by using microbes exogenous use of organic amendments (biochar, manure, and compost), and nano-remediation supplements, which significantly remediate Cr(VI)-contaminated soil/water and lessen possible health and environmental challenges. Future research needs and knowledge gaps are also covered. The review's observations should aid in the development of creative and useful methods for limiting Cr(VI) bioavailability, toxicity and sustainably managing Cr(VI)-polluted soils/water, by clear understanding of mechanistic basis of Cr(VI) toxicity, signaling pathways, and tolerance mechanisms; hence reducing its hazards to the environment.

Indexed as

chromium phytotoxicitycontaminationenvironmentplant physiology and growthremediation

Identifiers

PMID36714741
PMCPMC9880494
OpenAlexW4316041482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.