ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Antenatal corticosteroids is associated with better postnatal growth outcomes of very preterm infants: A national multicenter cohort study in China.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between antenatal corticosteroids and neonatal morbidities in a prospective cohort: role of course, timing, and gestational age.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Prenatal dexamethasone exposure and the risk of early-onset sepsis in preterm infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Association of different doses of antenatal corticosteroids exposure with early major outcomes and early weight loss percentage in extremely preterm infants or extremely low birthweight infants: a multicentre cohort study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration is a standardized prenatal care for accelerating fetal maturation before anticipated preterm delivery, however, its effect on nutrition and growth is yet uncertain. This study aimed to examine if ACS application is associated with improvement in postnatal growth and nutrition in very preterm infants (VPIs). Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective survey included infants born before 32 weeks gestation and admitted to 28 tertiary neonatal intensive care units throughout China from September 2019 to December 2020. Infants were divided into no ACS, partial ACS and complete ACS groups according to the steroids exposure. For infants exposed to antenatal corticosteroids, complete ACS was defined as receiving all doses of steroids 24 h-7 days before delivery, otherwise it was referred to partial ACS. The primary outcomes of postnatal growth were compared among the 3 groups. The multivariable regression analyses were applied to evaluate the association of different steroids coverage with postnatal growth and nutritional outcomes while adjusting for potential confounders. For each outcome, no ACS coverage was defined as the reference group. Data were presented as unstandardized coefficients or adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, Results: Among 2,514 infants included, complete ACS, partial ACS and no ACS group accounted for 48.7% (1,224/2,514), 29.2% (735/2,514) and 22.1% (555/2,514), respectively. The median weight growth velocity was 14.6 g/kg/d, 14.1 g/kg/d and 13.5 g/kg/d in complete, partial and no ACS group respectively with significant difference ( Conclusions: Both complete and partial ACS are associated with better postnatal growth outcomes in very preterm infants. This efficacy appeared to be more obvious in infants exposed to complete ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.