Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36714233›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2022

Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature.

Salvatore Cozzi, Lilia Bardoscia, Masoumeh Najafi, Sefik Igdem, Luca Triggiani, Stefano Maria Magrini, Andrea Botti, Ferran Guedea, Laura Melocchi, Patrizia Ciammella and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Salvatore CozziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Lilia BardosciaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, S. Luca Hospital, Healthcare Company Tuscany Northwest, Lucca, Italy.
Masoumeh NajafiDepartment of Radiation Oncology Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran, Iran.
Sefik IgdemDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Bilim University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Luca TriggianiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Stefano Maria MagriniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea BottiDepartment of Medical Physics, Azienda AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ferran GuedeaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura MelocchiDepartment of Pathology, Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Patrizia CiammellaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cinzia IottiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cristina GutierrezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ESUniversity of Brescia · ITFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITIstanbul Bilim University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical features and outcomes after different therapeutic strategies for ductal prostate adenocarcinoma (DPC), a rare but aggressive subtype of invasive prostate cancer (PCa) accounting for, in the pure and mixed form, 1% or less and 5% or less, respectively, of all the newly diagnosed PCa. Materials and methods: Patients with a proven diagnosis of DPC undergoing surgery, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy, alone or in combination, were considered for this multicenter, retrospective study. The study assessed overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and age-related disease-specific survival. Results: Eighty-one patients met the study inclusion criteria. Pure DPC was found in 29 patients (36%) and mixed ductal-acinar-PCa in 52 patients (64%). After a median follow-up of 63 months (range, 3-206 months), 3- and 5-year OS rates were 84% and 67%, respectively, and 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 54% and 34%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or DFS between the pure and mixed DPC groups. Pure DPC was associated with a higher rate of metastatic disease at onset. Patients 74 years or younger had better disease-specific survival ( Conclusions: Our study found DPC to be rarer, more aggressive, more likely to metastasize, and have a worse prognosis than the common acinar variant, especially in its pure form. Multicenter series are encouraged to obtain large data sets, or propensity score matching analyses with patients with conventional PCa are desirable to understand the best therapeutic approach and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Androgen deprivation therapyMixed ductal-acinar prostate cancerPure ductal carcinoma of the prostateRadiotherapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID36714233
PMCPMC9875213
OpenAlexW4293792488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.