ArticleCurrent urology2022
Article in Current urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal relationships between plasma metabolites and prostate cancer: A Mendelian randomization study exploring immune and inflammatory mediators.Current urology · 2026Article
- Determination and assessing the role of serum calcium, vitamin D, ferritin, and uric acid levels on prostate cancer risk.The Canadian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Does Systematic Use of Small Doses of Vitamin D Have Anti-Inflammatory Effects and Effectively Correct Deficiency Among Healthy Adults?Nutrients · 2025Article
- Review
- The impact of vitamin D on cancer: A mini review.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostatic epithelial cells synthesize the active form of vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D Materials and methods: This case-control study included 2 groups of patients: group A, a control group of 50 subjects with benign prostate hyperplasia, and group B, 50 subjects newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. All participants performed complete blood count, liver and kidney function tests, prostate specific antigen measurement, histopathological analysis and immunohistochemistry for Dickkopf Homolog 3. Restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction as performed to detect Results: Patients with prostate cancer and controls showed a significantly different Conclusion: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.