ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Congenital perineal hamartomas with rectal duplication: A case report.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel PPP1R12A Splice-Site Variant Identified in a Female Fetus With Perineal Hamartoma.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- A rare case of complex perineal anomaly in a male neonate: Multistage surgical management.Urology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital perineal hamartomas are rare, and reports of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis are limited. Perineal hamartomas are usually associated with other structural malformations, which complicate the therapeutic regime. Case presentation: We report a case of perineal hamartomas associated with rectal duplication in a female fetus. A review of the literature on similar cases was also presented. A fetus was first diagnosed with a perineal mass at 33 weeks of gestation using ultrasound examination in our hospital. Two-dimensional ultrasonography showed a hyperechoic mass resembling a scrotum in the perineum of the fetus. The pedicle connected the mass to the fetal anus. The masses were excised after birth, and perineal hamartomas were confirmed by pathological diagnosis. Rectal duplication, an associated malformation, was found during the surgery. The rectal duplication cyst was removed at the same time. Conclusion: Congenital perineal masses are rare and are usually associated with urogenital and anorectal malformations. Prenatal ultrasound should be used to assess the position and relationship between the mass and perineal organs, and to exclude other combined deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.