Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36714095›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Effectiveness and safety of anakinra in gouty arthritis: A case series and review of the literature.

Sicylle Jeria-Navarro, Alejandro Gomez-Gomez, Hye Sang Park, Enrique Calvo-Aranda, Hector Corominas, Maria Antonia Pou, Cesar Diaz-Torne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Gout therapy updated.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sicylle Jeria-NavarroRheumatology Department, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro Gomez-GomezRheumatology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Hye Sang ParkRheumatology Department, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique Calvo-ArandaCrystal-induced Arthritis Study Group, Spanish Society of Rheumatology (GEACSER), Madrid, Spain.
Hector CorominasRheumatology Department, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Antonia PouEAP Encants, SAP Dreta de Barcelona, ICS, Barcelona, Spain.
Cesar Diaz-TorneRheumatology Department, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESSpanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy · ESFC Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gout is the most common type of inflammatory arthritis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and colchicine are the first-line agents, although they are contraindicated in many patients. Blockade of IL-1 with anakinra can be an alternative. Objective: To present a case series of 10 difficult-to-treat gout patients treated with anakinra and perform a scoping review of the effectiveness and safety of anakinra in gout patients. Methods: A total of 1,519 citations were screened. The reviewers ran a two-stage screening process by title/abstract and full-text reading. Thirty-eight articles finally met the selection criteria and were included for data extraction and synthesis. Experience in difficult-to treat and complex clinical scenarios, such as active infection, hemodialysis, and transplantation, were specifically described. Results: The study sample comprised 551 patients, from whom 648 flares were finally analyzed. The mean age was 57.9 years, and 82.9% were men. The clinical presentation was polyarticular in 47.5% and tophaceous in 66.9%. Sixty-five patients with an active infection, 41 transplanted patients and 14 in haemodyalisis treated with anakinra are described. More than half of the patients had >1 associated comorbidity. Anakinra was effective both for flares (94%) and for long-term treatment (91%) and well tolerated. In the case of flares, 34 (6.7%) adverse effects were registered. Adverse events were more prevalent in long-term treatment. Conclusion: Anakinra was effective and safe for management of gout flares in difficult-to-treat patients. It has been used in multiple complex scenarios, such as active infections, dialysis, transplantation, chronic kidney disease, and polyarticular gout. Anakinra has also proven effective as long-term treatment, although there are more concerns about its safety.

Indexed as

anakinrabiological therapiesgoutgout flaregouty arthritisIL-1 blockadeIL-1 blocking agentsIL-1 inhibition

Identifiers

PMID36714095
PMCPMC9877612
OpenAlexW4315641189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.