Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36714056›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2023

Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID-19 in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Gary Groot, Stephanie Witham, Andreea Badea, Susan Baer, Michelle Dalidowicz, Bruce Reeder, John Froh, Tracey Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gary GrootDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-5125
Stephanie WithamDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Andreea BadeaDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Susan BaerSaskatchewan Health Authority Health Sciences Library Regina Saskatchewan Canada.
Michelle DalidowiczSaskatchewan Health Authority Health Sciences Library Regina Saskatchewan Canada.
Bruce ReederDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-514X
John FrohSaskatchewan Health Authority Royal University Hospital Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Tracey CarrDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-6702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluating a learning health system (LHS) encourages continuous system improvement and collaboration within the healthcare system. Although LHS is a widely accepted concept, there is little knowledge about evaluating an LHS. To explore the outputs and outcomes of an LHS model, we evaluated the COVID-19 Evidence Support Team (CEST) in Saskatchewan, Canada, an initiative to rapidly review scientific evidence about COVID-19 for decision-making. By evaluating this program during its formation, we explored how and to what extent the CEST initiative was used by stakeholders. An additional study aim was to understand how CEST could be applied as a functional LHS and the value of similar knowledge-to-action cycles. Methods: Using a formative evaluation design, we conducted qualitative interviews with key informants (KIs) who were involved with COVID-19 response strategies in Saskatchewan. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify key themes. A program logic model was created to represent the inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes of the CEST initiative. Results: Interview data from 11 KIs were collated under three overarching categories: (1) outputs, (2) short-term outcomes, and (3) long-term outcomes from the CEST initiative. Overall, participants found the CEST initiative improved speed and access to reliable information, supported and influenced decision-making and public health strategies, leveraged partnerships, increased confidence and reassurance, and challenged misinformation. Themes relating to the long-term outcomes of the initiative included improving coordination, awareness, and using good judgment and planning to integrate CEST sustainably into the health system. Conclusion: This formative evaluation demonstrated that CEST was a valued program and a promising LHS model for Saskatchewan. The future direction involves addressing program recommendations to implement this model as a functional LHS in Saskatchewan.

Indexed as

COVID‐19decision‐makingevaluationhealth services researchlearning health systemSaskatchewan

Identifiers

PMID36714056
PMCPMC9874378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.