Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713995›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2022

Preventing unnecessary imaging in patients suspect of coronary artery disease through machine learning of electronic health records.

L Malin Overmars, Bram van Es, Floor Groepenhoff, Mark C H De Groot, Gerard Pasterkamp, Hester M den Ruijter, Wouter W van Solinge, Imo E Hoefer, Saskia Haitjema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

L Malin OvermarsCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-0864
Bram van EsCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
Floor GroepenhoffCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-701X
Mark C H De GrootCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
Gerard PasterkampCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
Hester M den RuijterLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wouter W van SolingeCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
Imo E HoeferCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
Saskia HaitjemaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: With the ageing European population, the incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) is expected to rise. This will likely result in an increased imaging use. Symptom recognition can be complicated, as symptoms caused by CAD can be atypical, particularly in women. Early CAD exclusion may help to optimize use of diagnostic resources and thus improve the sustainability of the healthcare system. To develop sex-stratified algorithms, trained on routinely available electronic health records (EHRs), raw electrocardiograms, and haematology data to exclude CAD in patients upfront. Methods and results: We trained XGBoost algorithms on data from patients from the Utrecht Patient-Oriented Database, who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and/or stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, or stress single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) in the UMC Utrecht. Outcomes were extracted from radiology reports. We aimed to maximize negative predictive value (NPV) to minimize the false negative risk with acceptable specificity. Of 6808 CCTA patients (31% female), 1029 females (48%) and 1908 males (45%) had no diagnosis of CAD. Of 3053 CMR/SPECT patients (45% female), 650 females (47%) and 881 males (48%) had no diagnosis of CAD. On the train and test set, the CCTA models achieved NPVs and specificities of 0.95 and 0.19 (females) and 0.96 and 0.09 (males). The CMR/SPECT models achieved NPVs and specificities of 0.75 and 0.041 (females) and 0.92 and 0.026 (males). Conclusion: Coronary artery disease can be excluded from EHRs with high NPV. Our study demonstrates new possibilities to reduce unnecessary imaging in women and men suspected of CAD.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesClinical decision supportEHR dataMachine learningSex differences

Identifiers

PMID36713995
PMCPMC9707976
OpenAlexW4200421775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.