ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2022
Artificial intelligence-based detection of aortic stenosis from chest radiographs.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI Algorithms in Aortic Stenosis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical medicine & research · 2024Pooled it
- Foundation model for screening severe mitral regurgitation and severe aortic stenosis from coronary angiograms.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026Article
- Detecting Bicuspid Aortic Valve From Echocardiographic Reports Using Natural Language Processing: A Veterans Affairs Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning model for severe mitral stenosis detection from chest X-rays.Open heart · 2025Article
- Incidence and severity of aortic stenosis according to machine learning predicted risk of atrial fibrillation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- Multimodal deep learning model for enhanced early detection of aortic stenosis integrating ECG and chest x-ray with cooperative learning.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Applications and Prospects of Digital Health Technologies in Cardiovascular Nursing: Smart Devices, Remote Monitoring, and Personalized Care.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Digital health innovation and artificial intelligence in cardiovascular care: a case-based review.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Review
- Data set terminology of deep learning in medicine: a historical review and recommendation.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Transforming Cardiovascular Care With Artificial Intelligence: From Discovery to Practice: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Review
- Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- The Current Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Current radiology reports · 2024Article
- Severe aortic stenosis detection by deep learning applied to echocardiography.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases from Chest Radiography.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Correlation between artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram and echocardiographic features in aortic stenosis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Article
- The development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based screening method for atrial septal defect in children's chest x-rays.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Diagnostic AI and Cardiac Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Aortic Stenosis: New Insights in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention.Korean circulation journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: We aimed to develop models to detect aortic stenosis (AS) from chest radiographs-one of the most basic imaging tests-with artificial intelligence. Methods and results: We used 10 433 retrospectively collected digital chest radiographs from 5638 patients to train, validate, and test three deep learning models. Chest radiographs were collected from patients who had also undergone echocardiography at a single institution between July 2016 and May 2019. These were labelled from the corresponding echocardiography assessments as AS-positive or AS-negative. The radiographs were separated on a patient basis into training [8327 images from 4512 patients, mean age 65 ± (standard deviation) 15 years], validation (1041 images from 563 patients, mean age 65 ± 14 years), and test (1065 images from 563 patients, mean age 65 ± 14 years) datasets. The soft voting-based ensemble of the three developed models had the best overall performance for predicting AS with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.88), 0.78 (0.67-0.86), 0.71 (0.68-0.73), 0.71 (0.68-0.74), 0.18 (0.14-0.23), and 0.97 (0.96-0.98), respectively, in the validation dataset and 0.83 (0.78-0.88), 0.83 (0.74-0.90), 0.69 (0.66-0.72), 0.71 (0.68-0.73), 0.23 (0.19-0.28), and 0.97 (0.96-0.98), respectively, in the test dataset. Conclusion: Deep learning models using chest radiographs have the potential to differentiate between radiographs of patients with and without AS. Lay Summary: We created artificial intelligence (AI) models using deep learning to identify aortic stenosis (AS) from chest radiographs. Three AI models were developed and evaluated with 10 433 retrospectively collected radiographs and labelled from echocardiography reports. The ensemble AI model could detect AS in a test dataset with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.88). Since chest radiography is a cost-effective and widely available imaging test, our model can provide an additive resource for the detection of AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.