ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2022
Willingness to participate in cardiac telerehabilitation: results from semi-structured interviews.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac telerehabilitation under 5G internet of things monitoring: a randomized pilot study.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Initiation of Home-Based Exercise Rehabilitation After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A TDF-Based Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Factors Impacting the Telephone Follow-Up Response Rate in Patients With Migraine Without Aura: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1299 Females.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation.JACC. Asia · 2025Review
- Cardiac Telerehabilitation After Heart Attack Using E-Learning Platforms and Monitoring Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of digital therapeutics for home-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with chronic heart failure: model development and data analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023Article
- No transport? No worries! Cardiac telerehabilitation is a feasible and effective alternative to centre-based programs.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Hybrid cardiac telerehabilitation for coronary artery disease in Australia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Development and Internal Validation of the Digital Health Readiness Questionnaire: Prospective Single-Center Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- The Effects of an Online-Offline Hybrid Exercise Program on the Lives of Children with Cerebral Palsy Using Wheelchairs during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Competencies required by patients and health professionals regarding telerehabilitation: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is indicated in patients with cardiovascular disease but participation rates remain low. Telerehabilitation (TR) is often proposed as a solution. While many trials have investigated TR, few have studied participation rates in conventional CR non-participants. The aim of this study was to identify the percentage of patients that would be willing to participate in a TR programme to identify the main perceived barriers and facilitators for participating in TR. Methods and results: Two groups of patients were recruited: CR non-participants and CR participants. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Thirty non-participants and 30 participants were interviewed. Of CR non-participants, 33% would participate in TR and 10% would participate in a blended CR programme (combination of centre-based CR and TR). Of CR participants, 60% would participate in TR and 70% would be interested in a blended CR programme. Of those that would participate in TR, 44% would prefer centre-based CR, 33% would prefer a blended CR programme, and 11% would prefer a full TR programme. In both groups, the main facilitating aspect about TR was not needing transport and the main barrier was digital literacy. Conclusion: For CR non-participants, TR will only partly solve the problem of low participation rates and blended programmes might not offer a solution. Cardiac rehabilitation participants are more prepared to participate in TR and blended CR. Digital literacy was in both groups mentioned as an important barrier, emphasizing the challenges for healthcare and local governments to keep educating all types of patients in digital literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.