Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713665›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Restructuring surgical training after COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide survey on the Italian scenario on behalf of the Italian polyspecialistic young surgeons society (SPIGC).

Gaetano Gallo, Eleonora Guaitoli, Fabio Barra, Arcangelo Picciariello, Alessandro Pasculli, Alessandro Coppola, Davide Pertile, Roberto Luca Meniconi, SPIGC Surgical Training Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gaetano GalloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora GuaitoliDepartment of Surgery, A. Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy.
Fabio BarraAcademic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Arcangelo PicciarielloDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Alessandro PasculliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology - Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, University "A. Moro" of Bari, Policlinic of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Alessandro CoppolaDepartment of Surgery, La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Davide PertileDepartment of Surgery, Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Roberto Luca MeniconiDepartment of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
SPIGC Surgical Training Working Group
Sapienza University of Rome · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITOspedale A. Perrino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the disruption of surgical training. Lack of communication, guidelines for managing clinical activity as well as concerns for safety in the workplace appeared to be relevant issues. This study aims to investigate how surgical training has been reorganized in Italy, almost 2 years after the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: A 16-item-electronic anonymous questionnaire was designed through SurveyMonkey Results: Four hundred and thirty responses were collected, and 399 were considered eligible to be included in the study analysis. Three hundred and thirty-five respondents continued working in Surgical Units, with a significant reduction (less than one surgical session per week) of surgical sessions in 49.6% of them. With concern to didactic and research activities, 140 residents maintained their usual activity, while 116 reported a reduction. A sub-group analysis on resident moved to COVID-19 departments showed a reduction of research activities in 35% of them. During the period considered in this survey, the surgical training program was not substantially modified for most of participants (74.6%). Conclusion: Our survey demonstrated that surgical residency programs haven't improved 2 years after the beginning of the pandemic. Further improvements are needed to guarantee completeness of surgical training, even in emergency conditions.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicsurgical trainingsurveytraineetraining programme

Identifiers

PMID36713665
PMCPMC9875563
OpenAlexW4315786623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.