Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713597›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2021

Mapping and quantification of the twitter footprint of cardiologists.

Ankur Kalra, Ashish Kumar, Amy S Nowacki, Amna Shahadat, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Ahmad Jabri, Safi U Khan, Erin D Michos, Robert M Califf, Deepak L Bhatt

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The 1-year anniversary of theEuropean heart journal. Digital health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ankur KalraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 224 West Exchange St, Suite 225, Akron, OH 44302, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-1660
Ashish KumarSection of Cardiovascular Research, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Department, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4249-0055
Amy S NowackiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-1448
Amna ShahadatDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shahzeb KhanDepartment of Internal Medicine, John H Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ahmad JabriSection of Cardiovascular Research, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Department, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, USA.
Safi U KhanDepartment of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Erin D MichosDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5547-5084
Robert M CaliffClinical Policy and Strategy, Verily Life Sciences and Google Health, South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0231-3724
Deepak L BhattBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-6245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The increasing importance placed by medical journals for dissemination of published articles on social media, such as posting Altmetric scores, has further expedited the need for differentiating Methods and results: From a list of top 100 cardiology hospitals in accordance with the most recent US News and World Report rankings, 1500 cardiologists were selected based on institutional physician profile pages complete with cardiologists' headshots. The K-index of cardiologists, and variables like all-time posts, and posts for the past 12 months (1 June 2019 to 31 May 2020) from cardiologists were documented and analysed. The K-index of cardiologists in our study was stratified into the following categories (upper boundary inclusive); K-index 0-1 ( Conclusion: Considering no evidence of a difference in the number of citations across K-index categories, the stigma associated with higher K-index needs to be reconsidered.

Indexed as

CardiologistSocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID36713597
PMCPMC9708001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.