ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
DUSP10 upregulation is a poor prognosticator and promotes cell proliferation and migration in glioma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of LIMK1 as a biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: from data mining to validation.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Develop a prognostic and drug therapy efficacy prediction model for hepatocellular carcinoma based on telomere maintenance-associated genes.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- PEGylated Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle-bound Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Drugs Affect Prostate Cancer Cells and Alter the Expression of DUSP Family Genes.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-specificity phosphatase 10 (DUSP10) correlates with inflammation, cytokine secretion, cell proliferation, survival, and apoptosis. However, its role in glioma is unclear. Herein, we sought to examine the expression and the underlying carcinogenic mechanisms of DUSP10 action in glioma. DUSP10 expression in glioma was significantly higher than that in normal brain tissues. High DUSP10 expression indicated adverse clinical outcomes in glioma patients. Increased DUSP10 expression correlated significantly with clinical features in glioma. Univariate Cox analysis showed that high DUSP10 expression was a potential independent marker of poor prognosis in glioma. Furthermore, DUSP10 expression in glioma correlated negatively with its DNA methylation levels. DNA methylation level of DUSP10 also correlated negatively with poor prognosis in glioma. More importantly, DUSP10 expression correlated positively with the infiltration of B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells in glioma. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis confirmed that DUSP10 participated in signaling pathways involved in focal adhesion, TNF cascade, Th17 cell differentiation, and NF-kappa B cascade. Finally, we uncovered that DUSP10 was dramatically upregulated in glioblastoma (GBM) cells and that the knockdown of DUSP10 inhibited glioma cell proliferation and migration. Our findings suggested that DUSP10 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker in glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.