ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Machine-learning-based prediction of the effectiveness of the delivered dose by exhale-gated radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer: The additional value of geometric over dosimetric parameters alone.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do AI-based contouring algorithms influence physicians in the online adaptive radiotherapy of patients with bladder cancer?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis.BMC medical genomics · 2026Review
- Are treatment plans optimized on the basis of acuros XB dose calculation robust against anatomic changes during online adaptive radiotherapy for lung cancer regarding dose homogeneity?Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of accumulated and planned dose deviations in patients undergoing gated and non-gated lung stereotactic body radiation therapy patients: a retrospective analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Prospects for online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Respiration-controlled radiotherapy in lung cancer: Systematic evaluation of the optimal application practice.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess interfraction stability of the delivered dose distribution by exhale-gated volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for lung cancer and to determine dominant prognostic dosimetric and geometric factors. Methods: Clinical target volume (CTV Results: Altogether, 218 dose fractions (10 patients) were evaluated. There was a significant interpatient heterogeneity between the distributions of the normalized Conclusion: Accumulated dose distributions over the treatment series were robust against interfraction CTV deformations using exhale gating and online image guidance. D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.