Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713364›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Immunological consequences of microbiome-based therapeutics.

Md Zahidul Alam, Jeffrey R Maslanka, Michael C Abt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Host Immune Responses toTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  18. Bacteria associated with glioma: a next wave in cancer treatment.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Md Zahidul AlamDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jeffrey R MaslankaDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Michael C AbtDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Treating chronic viral infection by epigenetic reprogramming of exhausted CD8 T cellsR01AI130115 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ABT, MICHAEL C. · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Investigating Immune-Microbiome interactions during treatment of Clostridioides difficile with fecal microbiome transplantationR01AI158830 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ABT, MICHAEL C. · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Immune regulation of the transcriptional and spatial profile of Clostridioides difficileR21AI164385 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ABT, MICHAEL C. · 2021 to 2022
$447k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130115NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI158830NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI164385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex network of microscopic organisms living on and within humans, collectively referred to as the microbiome, produce wide array of biologically active molecules that shape our health. Disruption of the microbiome is associated with susceptibility to a range of diseases such as cancer, diabetes, allergy, obesity, and infection. A new series of next-generation microbiome-based therapies are being developed to treat these diseases by transplanting bacteria or bacterial-derived byproducts into a diseased individual to reset the recipient's microbiome and restore health. Microbiome transplantation therapy is still in its early stages of being a routine treatment option and, with a few notable exceptions, has had limited success in clinical trials. In this review, we highlight the successes and challenges of implementing these therapies to treat disease with a focus on interactions between the immune system and microbiome-based therapeutics. The immune activation status of the microbiome transplant recipient prior to transplantation has an important role in supporting bacterial engraftment. Following engraftment, microbiome transplant derived signals can modulate immune function to ameliorate disease. As novel microbiome-based therapeutics are developed, consideration of how the transplants will interact with the immune system will be a key factor in determining whether the microbiome-based transplant elicits its intended therapeutic effect.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaNeoplasmsBacteriaFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansObesityC. difficilefecal microbiota transplantationimmune checkpoint inhibitorslive biotherapeutic productsmicrobiome-based therapeuticmucosal immunityprobioticsregulatory T cells

Identifiers

PMID36713364
PMCPMC9878555
OpenAlexW4315796855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.