Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713312›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Third dose vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines improves protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Michiel J M Niesen, Robert Matson, Arjun Puranik, John C O'Horo, Colin Pawlowski, Celine Vachon, Douglas Challener, Abinash Virk, Melanie Swift, Leigh Speicher and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michiel J M Niesennference, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-6203
Robert Matsonnference, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Arjun Puraniknference, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
John C O'HoroDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0880-4498
Colin Pawlowskinference, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-7507
Celine VachonDivision of Quantitative Health Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Douglas ChallenerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6964-9639
Abinash VirkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Melanie SwiftDivision of Preventive, Occupational and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Leigh SpeicherDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Joel GordonDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN 56001, USA.
Holly GeyerDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Patrick J Lenehannference, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-9179
A J Venkatakrishnannference, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Venky Soundararajannference, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-9211
Andrew BadleyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Nference (United States) · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic Health System · USMayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of 2021 November 29, booster vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection has been recommended for all individuals aged 18 years and older in the United States. A key reason for this recommendation is the expectation that a booster vaccine dose can alleviate observed waning of vaccine effectiveness (VE). Although initial reports of booster effectiveness have been positive, the level of protection from booster vaccination is unclear. We conducted two studies to assess the impact of booster vaccination, with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection between August and December 2021. We first compared SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence in cohorts of 3-dose vaccine recipients to incidence in matched cohorts of 2-dose vaccine recipients (cohort size = 24,539 for BNT162b2 and 14,004 for mRNA-1273). Additionally, we applied a test-negative study design to compare the level of protection against symptomatic infection in 3-dose recipients to that observed in recent 2-dose primary vaccine series recipients. The 3-dose recipients experienced a significantly lower incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection than the matched 2-dose cohorts (BNT162b2 Incidence Rate Ratio: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.13 and mRNA-1273 IRR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.15). Results from the test-negative study showed the third vaccine dose mitigated waning of VE, with the risk of symptomatic infection in 3-dose recipients being comparable to that observed 7 to 73 days after the primary vaccine series. These results show that 3-dose vaccine regimens with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 are effective at reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection and support the widespread administration of booster vaccine doses.

Indexed as

BoosterCOVID-19EHRElectronic Health RecordsVaccine Effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36713312
PMCPMC9802350
OpenAlexW4293150197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.