Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713304›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2023

Frameworks for mapping lake ecosystem services. An example from Lithuania.

M Inácio, M Das, D Barceló, P Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M InácioEnvironmental Management Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, Vilnius LT-08303, Lithuania.
M DasDepartment of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal, India.
D BarcelóCatalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA-CERCA), Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
P PereiraEnvironmental Management Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, Vilnius LT-08303, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lake ecosystems are essential for human well-being. Due to its transboundary nature, connecting terrestrial and aquatic habitats, its environmental processes and functions support a wide array of ecosystem services (ES). Hence, despite its importance in supporting socio-ecologic systems, these freshwater ecosystems are highly impacted due to anthropogenic influence. ES may shed light on the importance of maintaining and restoring lake ecosystems. Hence, despite the increased effort in the last decades to provide robust spatial information, most scientific studies still follow a qualitative approach that carries a great deal of uncertainty and is not uptake by decision-makers. It is necessary to develop quantitative and robust methodologies for mapping ES, especially in the aquatic realm. This study develops several frameworks to map ES in lake ecosystems. Important to highlight is that this study.•develops a quantitative multi-method (biophysical and statistical) toolbox for lake ES multi-temporal mapping.•covers five ES from Provisioning, Regulating & Maintenance, and Cultural sections, namely: (1) Fibres and other materials for construction; (2) Water used for non-drinking purposes; (3) Maintenance of nursery populations; (4) nutrient regulation; and (5) recreation.•addresses three dimensions of ES: supply, flow; and demand.

Indexed as

Geographic information systemsIndicatorsMulti-Method for lakes ecosystem services mappingQuantitativeRemote sensing

Identifiers

PMID36713304
PMCPMC9874067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.