ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2022
Characterizing Prosthesis Control Fault during Human-Prosthesis Interactive Walking Using Intrinsic Sensors.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of AI/ML applications in multi-domain robotic rehabilitation: trends, gaps, and future directions.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Ambilateral Activity Recognition and Continuous Adaptation with a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis.IEEE transactions on robotics : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025Article
- A Review of Current State-of-the-Art Control Methods for Lower-Limb Powered Prostheses.Annual reviews in control · 2023Article
- Investigating the Association of Quantitative Gait Stability Metrics With User Perception of Gait Interruption Due to Control Faults During Human-Prosthesis Interaction.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The physical interactions between wearable lower limb robots and humans have been investigated to inform effective robot design for walking augmentation. However, human-robot interactions when internal faults occur within robots have not been systematically reported, but it is essential to improve the robustness of robotic devices and ensure the user's safety. This paper aims to (1) present a methodology to characterize the behavior of the robotic transfemoral prosthesis as an effective wearable robot platform while interacting with the users in the presence of internal faults, and (2) identify the potential data sources for accurate detection of the prosthesis fault. We first obtained the human perceived response in terms of their walking stability when the prosthesis control fault (inappropriate intrinsic control output/command) was emulated/applied in level-ground walking. Then the measurements and their features, obtained from the transfemoral prosthesis, were examined for the emulated faults that elicited a sense of instability in human users. The optimal features that contributed the most in separating faulty interaction from the normal walking condition were determined using two machine-learning-based approaches: One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM) and Mahalanobis Distance (MD) classifier. The OCSVM anomaly detector could achieve an average sensitivity of 85.7 % and an average false alarm rate of 1.7 % with a reasonable detecting time of 147.6 ms for detecting emulated control errors among all subjects. The result demonstrates the potential of using machine-learning-based schemes in identifying prosthesis control faults based on intrinsic sensors on the prosthesis. This study presents a procedure to study human-robot fault tolerance and inform the future design of robust prosthesis control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.