Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

The impact of

Loredana Canfora, Małgorzata Tartanus, Andrea Manfredini, Cezary Tkaczuk, Anna Majchrowska-Safaryan, Eligio Malusà

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Loredana CanforaCentre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Rome, Italy.
Małgorzata TartanusCentre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Rome, Italy.
Andrea ManfrediniCentre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Rome, Italy.
Cezary TkaczukInstitute of Agriculture and Horticulture, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland.
Anna Majchrowska-SafaryanInstitute of Agriculture and Horticulture, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland.
Eligio MalusàDepartment of Plant Protection, National Institute of Horticultural Research, Skierniewice, Poland.
Instytut Ogrodnictwa – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy · PLUniversity of Siedlce · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The multifunctionality of microorganisms, including entomopathogenic fungi, represents a feature that could be exploited to support the development, marketing, and application of microbial-based products for plant protection. However, it is likely that this feature could affect the composition and dynamics of the resident soil microorganisms, possibly over a longer period. Therefore, the methodology utilized to evaluate such impact is critical for a reliable assessment. The present study was performed to evaluate the impact of strains of Materials and methods: Soil samples in the vicinity of the root system were collected during a 3-year period, before and after the bioinocula application, in two organic strawberry plantations. Specific primers were used for the amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the fungal ITS region of the ribosome. Results and discussion: Data of the profile analysis from T-RFLP analysis were used to compare the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) occurrence and intensity in the inoculated soil with the uninoculated control. With regard to the impact on the bacterial community, both

Indexed as

Beauveria bassianaBeauveria brongniartiisoil bacteria communitysoil fungal communityT-RFLP

Identifiers

PMID36713158
PMCPMC9874679
OpenAlexW4315649666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.