Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36713005›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2022

Deep neural networks reveal novel sex-specific electrocardiographic features relevant for mortality risk.

Klaske R Siegersma, Rutger R van de Leur, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, David A Leon, Ernest Diez-Benavente, Liesbeth Rozendaal, Michiel L Bots, Ruben Coronel, Yolande Appelman, Leonard Hofstra and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Klaske R SiegersmaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-6867
Rutger R van de LeurDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-5870
N Charlotte Onland-MoretJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-913X
David A LeonFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9747-1762
Ernest Diez-BenaventeLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-4290
Liesbeth RozendaalJulius Gezondheidscentrum Parkwijk, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michiel L BotsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-9810
Ruben CoronelHeart Center, Department of Experimental Cardiology, AMC, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-6119
Yolande AppelmanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-7105
Leonard HofstraDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-686X
Pieter A DoevendansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-7169
Rutger J HassinkDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0237-7867
Hester M den RuijterLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-014X
René van EsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-4388
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLLeidsche Rijn Julius Health Centers · NLNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Incorporation of sex in study design can lead to discoveries in medical research. Deep neural networks (DNNs) accurately predict sex based on the electrocardiogram (ECG) and we hypothesized that misclassification of sex is an important predictor for mortality. Therefore, we first developed and validated a DNN that classified sex based on the ECG and investigated the outcome. Second, we studied ECG drivers of DNN-classified sex and mortality. Methods and results: A DNN was trained to classify sex based on 131 673 normal ECGs. The algorithm was validated on internal (68 500 ECGs) and external data sets (3303 and 4457 ECGs). The survival of sex (mis)classified groups was investigated using time-to-event analysis and sex-stratified mediation analysis of ECG features. The DNN successfully distinguished female from male ECGs {internal validation: area under the curve (AUC) 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 0.97]; external validations: AUC 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.90), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.94)}. Sex-misclassified individuals (11%) had a 1.4 times higher mortality risk compared with correctly classified peers. The ventricular rate was the strongest mediating ECG variable (41%, 95% CI: 31%, 56%) in males, while the maximum amplitude of the ST segment was strongest in females (18%, 95% CI: 11%, 39%). Short QRS duration was associated with higher mortality risk. Conclusion: Deep neural networks accurately classify sex based on ECGs. While the proportion of ECG-based sex misclassifications is low, it is an interesting biomarker. Investigation of the causal pathway between misclassification and mortality uncovered new ECG features that might be associated with mortality. Increased emphasis on sex as a biological variable in artificial intelligence is warranted.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceElectrocardiographyNeural networkSex differences

Identifiers

PMID36713005
PMCPMC9707888
OpenAlexW4293100069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.