Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36712916›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Antibody titer levels and the effect on subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large US-based cohort.

Adam Sullivan, David Alfego, Pingsha Hu, Laura Gillim, Ajay Grover, Chris Garcia, Oren Cohen, Stan Letovsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam SullivanLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
David AlfegoLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
Pingsha HuLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
Laura GillimLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
Ajay GroverLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
Chris GarciaLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
Oren CohenLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
Stan LetovskyLabCorp: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC, United States.
LabCorp (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a growing amount of data around the kinetics and durability of the antibody response induced by vaccination and previous infection, there is little understanding of whether or not a given quantitative level of antibodies correlates to protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection or reinfection. In this study, we examine SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody titers and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests in a large cohort of US-based patients. We analyzed antibody test results in a cohort of 22,204 individuals, 6.8% (n = 1,509) of whom eventually tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, suggesting infection or reinfection. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to understand the effect of various levels of anti-spike RBD antibody titers (classified into discrete ranges) on subsequent RT-PCR positivity rates. Statistical analyses included fitting a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the age-, sex- and exposure-adjusted hazard ratios for S antibody titer, using zip-code positivity rates by week as a proxy for COVID-19 exposure. It was found that the best models of the temporally associated infection risk were those based on log antibody titer level (HR = 0.836 (p < 0.05)). When titers were binned, the hazard ratio associated with antibody titer >250 Binding Antibody Units (BAU) was 0.27 (p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.18, 0.41]), while the hazard ratio associated with previous infection was 0.20 (p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.10, 0.39]). Fisher exact odds ratio (OR) for Ab titers <250 BAU showed OR = 2.84 (p < 0.05; 95% CI: [2.30, 3.53]) for predicting the outcome of a subsequent PCR test. Antibody titer levels correlate with protection against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection or reinfection when examining a cohort of real-world patients who had the spike RBD antibody assay performed.

Indexed as

AntibodyAUC, Area Under the CurveBAU, Binding Antibody UnitsCOVID-19HR, Hazard RatioIQR, Interquartile RangeNucleocapsidOR, Odds RatioRBD, Receptor Binding DomainROC, Receiver operating characteristicRT-PCR, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2SeroprevalenceSpike

Identifiers

PMID36712916
PMCPMC9862663
OpenAlexW4317666074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.