ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Biological gene extraction path based on knowledge graph and natural language processing.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuous progress of society and the vigorous development of science and technology have brought people the dawn of maintaining health and preventing and controlling diseases. At the same time, with the update and iteration of bioinformatics technology, the current biological gene research has also undergone revolutionary changes. However, a long-standing problem in genetic research has always plagued researchers, that is, how to find the most needed sample genes from a large number of sample genes, so as to reduce unnecessary research and reduce research costs. By studying the extraction path of biological genes, it can help researchers to extract the most valuable research genes and avoid wasting time and energy. In order to solve the above problems, this paper used the Bhattacharyya distance index and the Gini index to screen the sample genes when extracting the characteristic genes of breast cancer. In the selected 49 public genes, 6 principal components were extracted by principal component analysis (PCA), and finally the experimental results were tested. It was found that when the optimal number of characteristic genes was selected as 5, the recognition rate of genes reached the highest 90.31%, which met the experimental requirements. In addition, the experiment also proved that the characteristic gene extraction method designed in this paper had a removal rate of 99.75% of redundant genes, which can greatly reduce the time and money cost of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.