ArticleIEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2022
Spatial Coherence Adaptive Clutter Filtering in Color Flow Imaging-Part I: Simulation Studies.
Article in IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial Coherence Adaptive Clutter Filtering in Color Flow Imaging-Part II: Phantom andIEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The appropriate selection of a clutter filter is critical for ensuring the accuracy of velocity estimates in ultrasound color flow imaging. Given the complex spatio-temporal dynamics of flow signal and clutter, however, the manual selection of filters can be a significant challenge, increasing the risk for bias and variance introduced by the removal of flow signal and/or poor clutter suppression. We propose a novel framework to adaptively select clutter filter settings based on color flow image quality feedback derived from the spatial coherence of ultrasonic backscatter. This framework seeks to relax assumptions of clutter magnitude and velocity that are traditionally required in existing adaptive filtering methods to generalize clutter filtering to a wider range of clinically-relevant color flow imaging conditions. In this study, the relationship between color flow velocity estimation error and the spatial coherence of clutter filtered channel signals was investigated in Field II simulations for a wide range of flow and clutter conditions. This relationship was leveraged in a basic implementation of coherence-adaptive clutter filtering (CACF) designed to dynamically adapt clutter filters at each imaging pixel and frame based on local measurements of spatial coherence. In simulation studies with known scatterer and clutter motion, CACF was demonstrated to reduce velocity estimation bias while maintaining variance on par with conventional filtering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.