Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36712798›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Spreading rates of bacterial colonies depend on substrate stiffness and permeability.

Merrill E Asp, Minh-Tri Ho Thanh, Danielle A Germann, Robert J Carroll, Alana Franceski, Roy D Welch, Arvind Gopinath, Alison E Patteson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What is active wetting?The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimal mechanical interactions direct multicellular network formation on elastic substrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Merrill E AspPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3812-2276
Minh-Tri Ho ThanhPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Danielle A GermannPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Robert J CarrollPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Alana FranceskiBioInspired Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Roy D WelchBioInspired Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Arvind GopinathDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Alison E PattesonPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4004-1734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of bacteria to colonize and grow on different surfaces is an essential process for biofilm development. Here, we report the use of synthetic hydrogels with tunable stiffness and porosity to assess physical effects of the substrate on biofilm development. Using time-lapse microscopy to track the growth of expanding

Indexed as

bacterial coloniesbiofilmshydrogelsmechanobiologytraction force microscopy

Identifiers

PMID36712798
PMCPMC9802340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.