ArticleCureus2022
A Comparative Study of Left Atrial Function Index of Hypertensive Heart Failure Patients Versus Controls in a Teaching Hospital, Sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe left atrium contributes significantly to the left ventricular filling as it functions as a reservoir, conduit, and pump. These functions are referred to as the phasic function of the left atrium and they are assessed using left atrial volumes. The left atrial function index on the other hand is a rhythmic independent composite index which is a better marker of left atrial function. The study therefore aimed at comparing left atrial function (using the left atrial function index) among hypertensive heart failure patients, patients with hypertension but not in heart failure, and normotensive patients.
methodThe study was a cross-sectional analytical study that was carried out at Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. A total of 80 hypertensive heart failure patients, 80 hypertensive, and 40 normotensive patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited from the cardiology clinics using the convenience sampling method. The left atrial function index was determined using the volumetric method. Significance was assessed at
resultThe left atrial function index (21.13 ± 8.83 versus 42.28 ± 10.40 versus 50.47 ± 14.37,
conclusionLeft atrial function index was lowest among hypertensive heart failure patients compared with hypertensive and normotensive cohorts, and it was worse among heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients. However, there was no significant difference between the left atrial function index of the hypertensive and normotensive groups. As a result, we recommend that the left atrial function index should be incorporated into the routine echocardiographic assessment of patients in our day-to-day clinical practice and large studies should be carried out to determine the cut-off value for the left atrial function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.