ArticleCureus2022
Effect of Late-Onset Stroke Rehabilitation on Medical Morbidities and Functional Recovery: A Single-Center Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The concept of focused rehabilitative care and a dedicated rehabilitation setup is fairly less known among the people of developing countries. The main objective of the study is to assess the effect of late-onset stroke rehabilitation on its overall prognosis and to see whether and how the late initiation of rehabilitation would pose a significant effect on functional recovery and adverse medical outcomes Methods A single-center, prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary rehabilitation center for a duration of one and a half years. The subjects admitted to the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation were divided into three groups with respect to the onset to admission interval (OAI). Patients who got admitted within 30 days (OAI≤ 30 days) were considered the early rehabilitation group. OAI between 31 and 150 days was the late rehabilitation group and OAI of 151 days or more was the very late rehabilitation group. Barthel Index (BI), Modified Rankin Score (MRS), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were used as functional outcome measures at admission and discharge from indoors. Results Maximum complications were observed in the late rehabilitation group, i.e. 2.75±2.74, with an overall mean of 2.02±2.04 (p=0.003). Functional recovery assessed using BI shows a significant difference between the early (35.79±8.86) and late (40.62±10.5) rehabilitation groups (p= 0.0005). 6MWT at discharge showed significant improvement in the early rehabilitation group (p=0.005). Conclusion Early onset of rehabilitation showed better functional recovery and fewer adverse medical outcomes in stroke patients. A longer length of hospital stay (LOHS), with a mean duration of 88 ±2 days was needed for patients with higher OAIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.