Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36712588›Full record

ArticleIEEE signal processing magazine2022

Interpreting Brain Biomarkers: Challenges and solutions in interpreting machine learning-based predictive neuroimaging.

Rongtao Jiang, Choong-Wan Woo, Shile Qi, Jing Wu, Jing Sui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE signal processing magazine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Uncovering functional connectivity patterns predictive of cognition in youth using interpretable predictive modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Brain-phenotype predictions can survive across diverse real-world data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Rescuing missing data in connectome-based predictive modeling.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rongtao JiangDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA, 06520.
Choong-Wan WooCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea, 16419.
Shile QiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China, 211106.
Jing WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, 100069.
Jing SuiState Key Laboratory of Brain Cognition and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 100875.

Funding

Mining the Genomewide Scan: Genetic Profiles of Structural Loss in Schizophrenia: AD/ADRD supplementR01MH094524 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, TURNER, JESS · 2012 to 2021
$6.3M
Data-driven approaches to identify biomarkers from multimodal imaging big dataR01MH117107 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094524NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive modeling of neuroimaging data (predictive neuroimaging) for evaluating individual differences in various behavioral phenotypes and clinical outcomes is of growing interest. However, the field is experiencing challenges regarding the interpretability of the results. Approaches to defining the specific contribution of functional connections, regions, or networks in prediction models are urgently needed, which may help explore the underlying mechanisms. In this article, we systematically review the methods and applications for interpreting brain signatures derived from predictive neuroimaging based on a survey of 326 research articles. Strengths, limitations, and the suitable conditions for major interpretation strategies are also deliberated. In-depth discussion of common issues in existing literature and the corresponding recommendations to address these pitfalls are provided. We highly recommend exhaustive validation on the reliability and interpretability of the biomarkers across multiple datasets and contexts, which thereby could translate technical advances in neuroimaging into concrete improvements in precision medicine.

Identifiers

PMID36712588
PMCPMC9880880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.