Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36712408›Full record

ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2023

Influence of sex and rearing method on performance and flock uniformity in broilers-implications for research settings.

Ashley England, Kosar Gharib-Naseri, Sarbast K Kheravii, Shu-Biao Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of different ratios of male-to-female in broilers on performance and nutrients digestibility.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Frontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashley EnglandSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Kosar Gharib-NaseriSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Sarbast K KheraviiSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Shu-Biao WuSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
University of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male and female broiler chickens differ in their growth performance, carcass part weights and nutrient requirements. The potential reasons for these differences have been explored by looking at differences in nutrient digestibility, nutrient transporter gene expression as well as gut microbiota populations between male and female birds. Studies have shown that male broilers have higher crude protein requirements compared to female broilers. The expression of monosaccharide and amino acid transporters show conflicting results as expression depends on the interactions between sex and bird age and breed as well as which tissue is sampled. Differences in microbiota populations between the genders were reported which may contribute towards performance differences, however research in this area is limited. The differences observed between the sexes contribute to increased variation in nutrition trials, and the potential to rear birds as equally mixed-sex becomes an option to reduce the variation introduced by the sex effect. Difference in rearing options obviously would only be feasible provided a quick, practical and cost-effective method of sexing birds is available, a topic that is also discussed in this review.

Indexed as

ChickenGut microbiotaNutrient transporter gene expressionSex effectSexing method

Identifiers

PMID36712408
PMCPMC9869427
OpenAlexW4311173838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.