Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36712367›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Understanding European integration with bipartite networks of comparative advantage.

Riccardo Di Clemente, Balázs Lengyel, Lars F Andersson, Rikard Eriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Riccardo Di ClementeDepartment of Computer Science, Exeter University, Exeter EX4 4PY, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-6351
Balázs LengyelAgglomeration and Social Networks Lendület Research Group, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Budapest 1097, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-5599
Lars F AnderssonDepartment of Economic history, Umeå University, Umeå SE-90187, Sweden.
Rikard ErikssonDepartment of Geography, Umeå University, Umeå SE-90187, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3570-7690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core objectives of European common market integration are convergence and economic growth, but these are hampered by redundancy, and value chain asymmetries. The challenge is how to harmonize labor division to reach global competitiveness, meanwhile bridging productivity differences across the EU. We develop a bipartite network approach to trace pairwise co-specialization by applying the revealed comparative advantage method within and between the EU15 and Central and Eastern European (CEE). This approach assesses redundancies and the division of labor in the EU at the level of industries and countries. We find significant co-specialization among CEE countries but a diverging specialization between EU15 and CEE. Productivity increases in those CEE industries that have co-specialized with other CEE countries after EU accession, while co-specialization across CEE and EU15 countries is less related to productivity growth. These results show that a division of sectoral specialization can lead to productivity convergence between EU15 and CEE countries.

Indexed as

bipartite networkconvergenceEUlaborspecialization

Identifiers

PMID36712367
PMCPMC9802098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.